If the long con is to replace the idea of a 'creator' with the randomness of 'evolution', it seems like a lot of time and money invested for not much in the way of results with the ongoing Jurassic Park charade.
Does the belief in the pre-existence of giant lizard creatures automatically null and void everyone's idea of "God"? I mean, do people spend a lot of time thinking about dinosaurs? "Oh, look at these pictures of giant lizards...there must be no God....let's all just be nihilists and have big bang parties." People still gonna believe...
There has to be more to this as a cover story. But I reckon 'evolution' as a backdrop has entanglements with our friends in modern medicine who like to tell stories about DNA and genes as well...
Driving the concept of EXTINCTION into our brains is another psychological warfare angle. It ties into the Nuke hoax, and how the threat of annihilation wrecks our minds, makes us fearful and looking to leaders.
They wanted to nullify Christianity (to nullify the family unit as part of Eugenics) and went after creation with Dinos which later led to Darwin. Maybe they didn't realize the economy that would take off and I think that was secondary to the psy-op.
Still fake Dinos and fake Darwin doesn't mean there is no evolution but the Dino-Darwin darlings was great PR to get evolution at bat against creation. Like Darwin (and Einstein), later as you say the Human Genome Project and Venter also got paraded and PR'd to the brink to make them look real-just like they did with Covid parading fake virus photos around.
The timing is right. Look up the history of the invention of the Scofield Bible by a con man and convicted crook, and how it applies to the world today.
It's a massive indu$try. It pushes the theory of evolution which has spirtual/religious implications. It also promotes the idea of "fossil fuels" (nonsense) as a scarce resource. Let's not forget the Big Bang and all the fake outer space lore, too. These things are always layered.
Yes! I’ve been following him for years. He’s one of my go to podcasts when I’m working in my studio. Even my husband (who isn’t really into a lot of the stuff I listen to) likes him.
While I take my hat off to you for your seemingly very convincing case for dinosaurs being a hoax, naturally I must "do my own research".
I asked ChatGPT for the big discoveries of dinosaurs by discoverer and included in the list was Mary Anning, who grew up in Lyme Regis, Dorset, whose interesting story is told in Wikipedia.
"Her discoveries included the first correctly identified ichthyosaur skeleton when she was twelve years old;[1] the first two nearly complete plesiosaur skeletons; the first pterosaur skeleton located outside Germany; and fish fossils."
We are also told:
"Often a fossil would be found by a quarryman, construction worker, or road worker who would sell it to a wealthy collector, and it was the latter who was credited if the find was of scientific interest."
So the issue of so many dinosaurs being discovered by so few rich people can in part be explained perhaps by the fact that the very few rich credited with the discoveries are not necessarily the actual discoverers. In the case of Mary, as she was local and made so many discoveries, despite being both a woman and of low-birth, she couldn't completely be ignored - although it seems she certainly wasn't respected as she should have been.
The thing about Mary's discoveries though is that the animals she discovered aren't actually dinosaurs despite have "saur" in their names (coming from Greek "lizard"), they were marine vertebrates. When they were first discovered they were thought to be aquatic reptiles but later recognised as marine vertebrates.
Interestingly, we see evidence of fakery, however, the nature is more of "enhancement" than complete fakery.
"Anning also assisted Thomas Hawkins with his efforts to collect ichthyosaur fossils at Lyme in the 1830s. She was aware of his penchant to "enhance" the fossils he collected. Anning wrote: "he is such an enthusiast that he makes things as he imagines they ought to be; and not as they are really found...".[40] A few years later there was a public scandal when it was discovered that Hawkins had inserted fake bones to make some ichthyosaur skeletons seem more complete, and later sold them to the government for the British Museum's collection without the appraisers knowing about the additions.[41]"
So while I really laughed heartily over the Kemmeridge Bay (also in Dorset) bit in Part 1, I'm afraid it's kind of irrelevant as the creatures discovered aren't even considered dinosaurs anyway, they're just plain old marine vertebrates, the "saur" in their name giving us a bum steer. I don't mean to downgrade ancient marine vertebrates but they just don't have the magical allure of "dinosaur", do they? Included in the Etches Collection are some fossils discovered by Mary Anning.
With regard to the alleged hatched egg that has a nearly-flat top you refer to in Part 1 I wonder if this might actually be a broken coprolite mentioned in the Mary Anning bio. Although, of course, I wouldn't have a clue.
"Her observations played a key role in the discovery that coprolites, known as bezoar stones at the time, were fossilised faeces, and she also discovered that belemnite fossils contained fossilised ink sacs like those of modern cephalopods."
longtime fans've Mary Anning! She wuz "the beans" (i.e. the real deal) an' sole support of her fambly after her daddy (who taught'er) died--many say that a) she wuz the source of "she sells sea shells by the seashore" tongue twister an' b) if I'm recallin' right she wuz the 1st woman member of the Geological Society--after much ado b/c she lacked "crud-entrails" (like the men folk). That said, she spoke so eloquently on the matter (often puttin' the less-informed expurts ta shame) that she eventually got the recognition she deserved--albeit begrudgingly (also--per above) likely b/c she knew whut was sheer "imagination"/invent-SHUN!
Yep it's so silly although I always look at my chicken's and think they look like tiny dinosaurs so maybe that's where the idea of the hoax was inspired
Even as a young whelp in elementary school so very long ago, I thought the notion that all of the oil in the earth that is extracted for energy came about from decomposing dinosaurs was absurd. I don't know if the charlatans in the Public Fool System still teach that errant nonsense or whether they are stupid enough to believe it themselves. What I do know is that on literally every matter or subject of any significance, they routinely lie, distort, and obfuscate. Particularly regarding those things that have a direct impact on our lives. Welcome to kosher, clown world.
I struggle with this one to be frank as I wanted to be a paleontologist as a kid and live near a place where one of my fathers friends found fossils when operating a digger and stopped. He died poor and never had an extra dollar and stopped the construction when he said "what is that?" in the dirt.
No need to struggle. While a very entertaining and reasonably persuasive case is presented it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. If you check out dinosaur digs on YT they're quite convincing and the seeming anomaly of only a few rich people finding dinosaur bones can be explained by the fact that other people found them too - and still are - they just weren't credited. See my comment - https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/dinosaur-hoax-part-2-psyops-and-schemes/comment/53385696
The public wants to believe in dinosaurs so we were willingly gullible. Anyway, dinosaurs are hugely profitable so they're now entrenched in our society.
I don't especially want to believe in dinosaurs, what I really, really want is not to disbelieve things that are true and thus undermine myself Boy Who Cried Wolf style when calling out the many lies they do tell us. That's what I really, really want and what I'd hope others do too.
We surely never want to become "useful idiots" by disbelieving things that are true and making fools of ourselves.
Agent131711's case is highly entertaining and reasonably persuasive ... until you go and look at the evidence yourself. Look up dinosaur digs on YouTube, etc go to a museum that holds bones you can look at. As they say, you really do need to do your own research.
My sister's approach is to work with what she "currently knows" and "what makes sense" from that. She quite openly thinks that's the right approach. For her, an alleged dinosaur 6 stories high "makes no sense" and so therefore she doesn't believe in dinosaurs ... with the addition of a couple of other experiences: going to a museum that had no real dinosaur bones and going into a university bookshop that only had dinosaur books for children. That is so very much the wrong approach. You need to canvass the evidence widely, not judge what you think is possible or not, look at the evidence first ... and the fact that you didn't dig up a dinosaur yourself doesn't mean you don't have evidence. I have to admit that an animal roaming around that's 6 stories high stretches credulity but imagine if you didn't know about giraffes and someone told you about them. You might well think such a tall animal - 2 stories high - especially with such a short body probably wasn't possible, wouldn't you?
You must always look at the evidence first and first-hand evidence isn't the only kind.
So for starters, do they get DNA from the bones to know (invent) the next species? And how do they know what the skin of all these species looks like? I always wondered that. It always seemed a little sketchy to me. And now it seems like a giant money laundering operation. Is there anything they don't monetize?
Betcha didnt know there were dinosaurs on Saturn's moon, Hyperion. We know this because the Cassini spacecraft found craters filled with fossil fuels (lakes of the stuff) on Hyperion:
PASADENA, Calif. -- NASA's Cassini spacecraft has revealed for the first time surface details of Saturn's moon Hyperion, including cup-like craters filled with hydrocarbons that may indicate more widespread presence in our solar system of basic chemicals necessary for life.
Agent 131711. I love your name. I love your research. And I love your presentation. Too bad it is more evidence of our corrupt world. Thank you for the laughs.
Enjoyin' this a passle as are my kids--guess cuz we're big'ol fans of PT Barnum (any relation ta that "earl" man?). Did'ja know 'bout this fun tale? I'd sure've liked ta see that "dime museum!" (I think they're hidin' a lot worse under the park now tho'!)
If the long con is to replace the idea of a 'creator' with the randomness of 'evolution', it seems like a lot of time and money invested for not much in the way of results with the ongoing Jurassic Park charade.
Does the belief in the pre-existence of giant lizard creatures automatically null and void everyone's idea of "God"? I mean, do people spend a lot of time thinking about dinosaurs? "Oh, look at these pictures of giant lizards...there must be no God....let's all just be nihilists and have big bang parties." People still gonna believe...
There has to be more to this as a cover story. But I reckon 'evolution' as a backdrop has entanglements with our friends in modern medicine who like to tell stories about DNA and genes as well...
Driving the concept of EXTINCTION into our brains is another psychological warfare angle. It ties into the Nuke hoax, and how the threat of annihilation wrecks our minds, makes us fearful and looking to leaders.
They wanted to nullify Christianity (to nullify the family unit as part of Eugenics) and went after creation with Dinos which later led to Darwin. Maybe they didn't realize the economy that would take off and I think that was secondary to the psy-op.
Still fake Dinos and fake Darwin doesn't mean there is no evolution but the Dino-Darwin darlings was great PR to get evolution at bat against creation. Like Darwin (and Einstein), later as you say the Human Genome Project and Venter also got paraded and PR'd to the brink to make them look real-just like they did with Covid parading fake virus photos around.
Here you can see Venter making genomes in record time because they are all fake, just like the Dinos. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.302.5649.1307a
Sadly, the name"Dinosaur" is also fake. The actual story is that a bloke named Deano " saw us" casting fake tracks and bones.
Ironically, they buried this truth.
The timing is right. Look up the history of the invention of the Scofield Bible by a con man and convicted crook, and how it applies to the world today.
https://discover.hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/Founder-of-the-Scholfield-Bible-a-con-man
Don't forget about "fossil fuel"! (Even as a child I did not believe that.)
It’s also a gigantic money making scheme, as well as producing fame and notoriety.
It's a massive indu$try. It pushes the theory of evolution which has spirtual/religious implications. It also promotes the idea of "fossil fuels" (nonsense) as a scarce resource. Let's not forget the Big Bang and all the fake outer space lore, too. These things are always layered.
Is it merely coincidence that Brown and P.T. share the name "Barnum"?
I am not a paleontologist, and I did not stay at a Motel 6 last night, but it appears to me that they share a bit more than just a name.
thought the same thing myself! Fiji Mermaid all the way ta the "Egress!"
there is only one fossil I know of; Georgiosoros , He should be extinct by now but no such luck
Epic article series so far! Loving it.
Please email me - revisionof911@gmail.com - My friend Jeremy Nell aka Jerm Warfare, https://jermwarfare.com/ would love to interview you on his podcast to chat about this...
Oooo that would be awesome!
Do you know Jerm Warfare's work?
Yes! I’ve been following him for years. He’s one of my go to podcasts when I’m working in my studio. Even my husband (who isn’t really into a lot of the stuff I listen to) likes him.
Great to hear ;-)
This reminds me of archaeology in the Levant, where only the chosen, find the historical evidence of their existence but usually in the wrong layer,
And After scrutinization and being called out, the said person is anti something or another.
The correct chronology immediately wipes 700 years off our timeline . That’s another rabbit hole.
It's a rabbi hole! And I'm sure it's all just a Cohencidence.
While I take my hat off to you for your seemingly very convincing case for dinosaurs being a hoax, naturally I must "do my own research".
I asked ChatGPT for the big discoveries of dinosaurs by discoverer and included in the list was Mary Anning, who grew up in Lyme Regis, Dorset, whose interesting story is told in Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Anning. We are told:
"Her discoveries included the first correctly identified ichthyosaur skeleton when she was twelve years old;[1] the first two nearly complete plesiosaur skeletons; the first pterosaur skeleton located outside Germany; and fish fossils."
We are also told:
"Often a fossil would be found by a quarryman, construction worker, or road worker who would sell it to a wealthy collector, and it was the latter who was credited if the find was of scientific interest."
So the issue of so many dinosaurs being discovered by so few rich people can in part be explained perhaps by the fact that the very few rich credited with the discoveries are not necessarily the actual discoverers. In the case of Mary, as she was local and made so many discoveries, despite being both a woman and of low-birth, she couldn't completely be ignored - although it seems she certainly wasn't respected as she should have been.
The thing about Mary's discoveries though is that the animals she discovered aren't actually dinosaurs despite have "saur" in their names (coming from Greek "lizard"), they were marine vertebrates. When they were first discovered they were thought to be aquatic reptiles but later recognised as marine vertebrates.
Interestingly, we see evidence of fakery, however, the nature is more of "enhancement" than complete fakery.
"Anning also assisted Thomas Hawkins with his efforts to collect ichthyosaur fossils at Lyme in the 1830s. She was aware of his penchant to "enhance" the fossils he collected. Anning wrote: "he is such an enthusiast that he makes things as he imagines they ought to be; and not as they are really found...".[40] A few years later there was a public scandal when it was discovered that Hawkins had inserted fake bones to make some ichthyosaur skeletons seem more complete, and later sold them to the government for the British Museum's collection without the appraisers knowing about the additions.[41]"
So while I really laughed heartily over the Kemmeridge Bay (also in Dorset) bit in Part 1, I'm afraid it's kind of irrelevant as the creatures discovered aren't even considered dinosaurs anyway, they're just plain old marine vertebrates, the "saur" in their name giving us a bum steer. I don't mean to downgrade ancient marine vertebrates but they just don't have the magical allure of "dinosaur", do they? Included in the Etches Collection are some fossils discovered by Mary Anning.
With regard to the alleged hatched egg that has a nearly-flat top you refer to in Part 1 I wonder if this might actually be a broken coprolite mentioned in the Mary Anning bio. Although, of course, I wouldn't have a clue.
"Her observations played a key role in the discovery that coprolites, known as bezoar stones at the time, were fossilised faeces, and she also discovered that belemnite fossils contained fossilised ink sacs like those of modern cephalopods."
longtime fans've Mary Anning! She wuz "the beans" (i.e. the real deal) an' sole support of her fambly after her daddy (who taught'er) died--many say that a) she wuz the source of "she sells sea shells by the seashore" tongue twister an' b) if I'm recallin' right she wuz the 1st woman member of the Geological Society--after much ado b/c she lacked "crud-entrails" (like the men folk). That said, she spoke so eloquently on the matter (often puttin' the less-informed expurts ta shame) that she eventually got the recognition she deserved--albeit begrudgingly (also--per above) likely b/c she knew whut was sheer "imagination"/invent-SHUN!
I like your creative description, Daisy.
Yep it's so silly although I always look at my chicken's and think they look like tiny dinosaurs so maybe that's where the idea of the hoax was inspired
Even as a young whelp in elementary school so very long ago, I thought the notion that all of the oil in the earth that is extracted for energy came about from decomposing dinosaurs was absurd. I don't know if the charlatans in the Public Fool System still teach that errant nonsense or whether they are stupid enough to believe it themselves. What I do know is that on literally every matter or subject of any significance, they routinely lie, distort, and obfuscate. Particularly regarding those things that have a direct impact on our lives. Welcome to kosher, clown world.
I struggle with this one to be frank as I wanted to be a paleontologist as a kid and live near a place where one of my fathers friends found fossils when operating a digger and stopped. He died poor and never had an extra dollar and stopped the construction when he said "what is that?" in the dirt.
I never bought the fossil fuels thing though.
No need to struggle. While a very entertaining and reasonably persuasive case is presented it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. If you check out dinosaur digs on YT they're quite convincing and the seeming anomaly of only a few rich people finding dinosaur bones can be explained by the fact that other people found them too - and still are - they just weren't credited. See my comment - https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/dinosaur-hoax-part-2-psyops-and-schemes/comment/53385696
The public wants to believe in dinosaurs so we were willingly gullible. Anyway, dinosaurs are hugely profitable so they're now entrenched in our society.
I don't especially want to believe in dinosaurs, what I really, really want is not to disbelieve things that are true and thus undermine myself Boy Who Cried Wolf style when calling out the many lies they do tell us. That's what I really, really want and what I'd hope others do too.
We surely never want to become "useful idiots" by disbelieving things that are true and making fools of ourselves.
Agent131711's case is highly entertaining and reasonably persuasive ... until you go and look at the evidence yourself. Look up dinosaur digs on YouTube, etc go to a museum that holds bones you can look at. As they say, you really do need to do your own research.
My sister's approach is to work with what she "currently knows" and "what makes sense" from that. She quite openly thinks that's the right approach. For her, an alleged dinosaur 6 stories high "makes no sense" and so therefore she doesn't believe in dinosaurs ... with the addition of a couple of other experiences: going to a museum that had no real dinosaur bones and going into a university bookshop that only had dinosaur books for children. That is so very much the wrong approach. You need to canvass the evidence widely, not judge what you think is possible or not, look at the evidence first ... and the fact that you didn't dig up a dinosaur yourself doesn't mean you don't have evidence. I have to admit that an animal roaming around that's 6 stories high stretches credulity but imagine if you didn't know about giraffes and someone told you about them. You might well think such a tall animal - 2 stories high - especially with such a short body probably wasn't possible, wouldn't you?
You must always look at the evidence first and first-hand evidence isn't the only kind.
Please look into flat earth next.
Of course Steven Spielberg (whats in a name) was called in to further establish this bogus story, just like he did with the WW2 theatre
So for starters, do they get DNA from the bones to know (invent) the next species? And how do they know what the skin of all these species looks like? I always wondered that. It always seemed a little sketchy to me. And now it seems like a giant money laundering operation. Is there anything they don't monetize?
Betcha didnt know there were dinosaurs on Saturn's moon, Hyperion. We know this because the Cassini spacecraft found craters filled with fossil fuels (lakes of the stuff) on Hyperion:
PASADENA, Calif. -- NASA's Cassini spacecraft has revealed for the first time surface details of Saturn's moon Hyperion, including cup-like craters filled with hydrocarbons that may indicate more widespread presence in our solar system of basic chemicals necessary for life.
https://science.nasa.gov/missions/cassini/nasa-finds-hydrocarbons-on-saturns-moon-hyperion/
Agent 131711. I love your name. I love your research. And I love your presentation. Too bad it is more evidence of our corrupt world. Thank you for the laughs.
Enjoyin' this a passle as are my kids--guess cuz we're big'ol fans of PT Barnum (any relation ta that "earl" man?). Did'ja know 'bout this fun tale? I'd sure've liked ta see that "dime museum!" (I think they're hidin' a lot worse under the park now tho'!)
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/dinosaur-museum-central-park-boss-tweed-nyc