My mom - born in 1930 - always said she did not believe in dinosaurs and this was all fake - she knew lots of other things as well that are proving accurate and I always trusted her - she only had a high school education so that probably explains why she couldn’t be easily deceived.
My first thought when browsing this article is that it should be easy to distinguish modern bones from "ancient" ones via DNA analysis. I googled "DINOSAUR GENETIC ANALYSIS" and the research is sparse and unimpressive. Oh, and also it appears to be predominantly from the 1990s when DNA analysis was in its infancy. Definitely adds to the heavy rat smell here.
This may sound completely nuts, but what if the whole dinosaur thing is a way to divert people away from the Nephilim. It sounds like there is proof that the Nephilim existed, which they're hiding (I would love to hear your take on that). Maybe they're like, "let's give the people giant lizards to keep them happy so they don't start asking about the Nephilim bones that people are digging up".
For those who don't want to watch a presentation that is a couple of hours long, here is a shorter version of the Medusa event video showing some of the evidence for rapid fossilization https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLOTsNqESEs.
The same channel, documents what Mike believes is an ancient, titanic elephant that is now a mountain in Spain. His belief is mainly due to distinct anatomical features of the eye socket and ear canal that are now caves. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6WEhQPTQUSXKpXbJoJjlhNJHhFI_qdHE
I live near D.C. The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History is near me. I am motivated to go down there and take pictures specific to helping prove or disprove this theory, as they have a number of supposed dinosaur skeletons, some of which are over 30 feet long. If I can find even one section of bone that appears authentic and cannot be found in today's animals, or recent ones, then it would be useful. I have probably the best camera phone you can buy. If anyone has any requests, of what to specifically focus on, let me know. I can visit as often as I wish, there is no entry cost, and it's a little over an hour one way. They even let you handle certain fossils on certain days. Sounds like fun to me. Let me know if you recommend any specific photo subjects, and I can even bring a tape measure of some type.
First visit, with two short videos. What I noticed (and expected to), was that the majority of the skeletons were made of some composite material which had the supposed fragments of bone spaced here and there (see pictures). So the majority of the skeleton is fragments (supposedly), pieced together when possible, but largely these composite materials. I realize I don't have much information on the individual pieces, the locations of the finds, the original find and its contents. This would of course be extremely easy to fake. The question is, how would they get so many on board, and then, the academics of it, such a fakery if so, not surprising either if so. So I don't know that, other than perhaps the mastodon, if there are really any full skulls or bones here. The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History is not considered a high level dinosaur exhibit. Those are other museums in other states
Dolphins and mammoths are mammals, why do you call ancient ones dinosaurs which are said to be reptiles or is this just to make a point about dino fraud?
My mom - born in 1930 - always said she did not believe in dinosaurs and this was all fake - she knew lots of other things as well that are proving accurate and I always trusted her - she only had a high school education so that probably explains why she couldn’t be easily deceived.
My first thought when browsing this article is that it should be easy to distinguish modern bones from "ancient" ones via DNA analysis. I googled "DINOSAUR GENETIC ANALYSIS" and the research is sparse and unimpressive. Oh, and also it appears to be predominantly from the 1990s when DNA analysis was in its infancy. Definitely adds to the heavy rat smell here.
Is it possible the Smithsonian etc stuck giant fake teeth into normal animal skulls? Sure seems that way with the sabertooth tiger
This may sound completely nuts, but what if the whole dinosaur thing is a way to divert people away from the Nephilim. It sounds like there is proof that the Nephilim existed, which they're hiding (I would love to hear your take on that). Maybe they're like, "let's give the people giant lizards to keep them happy so they don't start asking about the Nephilim bones that people are digging up".
For those who don't want to watch a presentation that is a couple of hours long, here is a shorter version of the Medusa event video showing some of the evidence for rapid fossilization https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLOTsNqESEs.
This is an interesting rabbit hole to go down. Hearts that have turned to stone with their anatomy intact. From Stellium 7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLOTsNqESEs
The same channel, documents what Mike believes is an ancient, titanic elephant that is now a mountain in Spain. His belief is mainly due to distinct anatomical features of the eye socket and ear canal that are now caves. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6WEhQPTQUSXKpXbJoJjlhNJHhFI_qdHE
I live near D.C. The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History is near me. I am motivated to go down there and take pictures specific to helping prove or disprove this theory, as they have a number of supposed dinosaur skeletons, some of which are over 30 feet long. If I can find even one section of bone that appears authentic and cannot be found in today's animals, or recent ones, then it would be useful. I have probably the best camera phone you can buy. If anyone has any requests, of what to specifically focus on, let me know. I can visit as often as I wish, there is no entry cost, and it's a little over an hour one way. They even let you handle certain fossils on certain days. Sounds like fun to me. Let me know if you recommend any specific photo subjects, and I can even bring a tape measure of some type.
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AnEptYvkW7yggvEyiFWc71581GYzxw
First visit, with two short videos. What I noticed (and expected to), was that the majority of the skeletons were made of some composite material which had the supposed fragments of bone spaced here and there (see pictures). So the majority of the skeleton is fragments (supposedly), pieced together when possible, but largely these composite materials. I realize I don't have much information on the individual pieces, the locations of the finds, the original find and its contents. This would of course be extremely easy to fake. The question is, how would they get so many on board, and then, the academics of it, such a fakery if so, not surprising either if so. So I don't know that, other than perhaps the mastodon, if there are really any full skulls or bones here. The Smithsonian Museum of Natural History is not considered a high level dinosaur exhibit. Those are other museums in other states
Dolphins and mammoths are mammals, why do you call ancient ones dinosaurs which are said to be reptiles or is this just to make a point about dino fraud?