Chemtrails Chapter 8: The Grid and Payload Explained
This post is my interpretation of government documents and research. Please always do you own research, view all of the documents I provide, and most importantly, LOOK UP.
I wanted to start off this post by saying THANK YOU to Kathi and AboutYourHealth for the donations! It really means a lot! Now let’s get into todays content:
I often hear people say “GeoEngineering is a Hoax! It’s not happening yet!”, which is clearly false. It IS happening and has been happening since the early 1900s, when Hatfield flooded San Francisco, California via GeoEngineering:
The military, NASA and several dozen other three-and-four-letter agencies have spent 40+ YEARS studying lower-atmosphere and upper-atmosphere wind patterns by releasing chemicals, which most refer to as “tracers”, then watching where the chemicals (tracers) go. NASAs tracers often consist of Aluminum, Barium, Lithium and Strontium, to name a few (which is exactly what is coming down in our rainwater and snow):
Random tidbit, the NASA tracer program logo sure looks like two chemtrails to me:
Over time NASA and their pals have learned how to control the wind, which was a huge step toward full-scale GeoEngineering, and the #1 factor in Chemtrails. But, just in case you still want to say GeoEngineering is a “Hoax”, here’s a couple government documents to open your eyes:
Here’s a CIA declassified a document WRITTEN IN 1965, in response to a FOIA. This document states, in 1965, the gov was delivering "man-made materials into the atmosphere" for Weather Modification.
1966 NASA document that outlines agencies and funding that were CURRENTLY involved in GeoEngineering:
Then there’s the 1996 military document called Owning the Weather by 2025, which talks about lasers punching holes in clouds, use of aerosols and more.
By 2008, the FTC was concerned about “Weather Events” BEING TRADED, specifically, how it would impact insurance companies. (Think about how crazy that is! TRADING “weather events” like stocks!). Here’s part of an email from the Federal Trade Commission to the Secretary and Commissioner:
… it’s a very lengthy email and we will cover it more in the future, but if you want to read it now, here you go.
There’s also the 2009 military document titled “Weather Control in 2030” which, amongst many other topics, discusses making artificial “nanoclouds” and Direct Energy Weapons (DEWs).
Also in 2009 and 2010 Congress met three times to discuss spraying Sulfur into the atmosphere to block the sun:
It takes nothing more than two eyeballs and a fully functioning brain to read the above documents then look at the video below and see that what we are witnessing is exactly what is described in the documents:
There’s tons more evidence including congressional testimony, patents, United Nations meetings and treaties, past, present and future GeoEngineering contacts on .gov sites, hell, even the current federal budget for the United States has GeoEngineering in it. We even have the chemtrail plane documents including costs, release locations, logistics and more. Now that we have established it is NOT a hoax, and it IS happening, let’s get into the Chemtrail Grid.
THE CHEMTRAIL “GRID” EXPLAINED
There’s usually two parts to Chemtrails: Part 1 is the Grid. Part 2 is the Payload.
The Chemtrail Grid is essential, depending on wind patterns (which, as you know, were mastered many decades ago). The Grid makes the air stagnant. This allows whatever the payload is to be targeted. If the grid was not first sprayed, the nanoparticles would blow all over and the purpose of chemtrails (Chapter 1 on this Substack) would be defeated. The Grid doesn’t always need to look like an Excel Spreadsheet; again, it is dependent upon the wind pattern. You may see a grid that is only vertical or horizontal lines, that, when first sprayed, is evenly-spaced (as it expands and blends together the spacing becomes hard to view):
Whereas other grids look like giant tic tac toe boards or even spiderwebs on top of tic tac toe boards:
If you look closely at grids, they can be very elaborate, consisting of T-joints, sharp angles, side-barriers and boundary markers:
PAYLOADS
If a payload is used, the payload typically is sprayed in the evening, or even nighttime hours because the grid is generally sprayed during the day. The payload can be white or a variety of different colors, based on the chemical composition. It is not uncommon to see red, yellow, orange, pink, charcoal, jet black, even blue-ish or green-ish tint.
Sometimes you may see two (or more) planes, nearly side-by-side, each emitting a different color of plume:
You might even get extra lucky and see 1 plane emitting two different colors at the same time. This is because there are two different chemical tanks, and when they are released, the chemicals blend in the atmosphere. I can only assume that this is because the toxic chemicals cannot be mixed into the same tank:
While there is no way for us to know exactly what is in the chemicals being released, we do know what color metals appear when they are released into the sky, whether it be through Tracer Programs or even Fireworks (FYI: Fireworks are literally chemtrails. Please do not shoot them off.)
Although Barium is greenish when ignited, it can appear silver-yellow when directly released into the air. And any combination of the chemicals and the reaction they have with each other will create it’s own shade, so it really is like a box of Crayola crayons.
Speaking of colors, NASA is MAKING “Auroras” using chemicals. Then the media makes people think this is natural. It’s not:
“What’s in the payload?”, you ask. Welllll…. on NASA.gov, you can hire them to put your “payload” into the atmosphere:
Your payload can be a hazardous chemical if you want, just be sure to notate it on the NASA application form: https://airbornescience.nasa.gov/content/Payload_Information_Form#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20the%20PIF,start%20the%20instrument%20integration%20process. So to answer your question, “What is in the payload”, unfortunately, the answer is: “Who f*cking knows”. This military document outlines unmanned planes carrying “genetic weapons”:
What does a “Genetic Weapon” look like???? No clue. For all we know, it could look like a fake NASA Aurora:
I’ll leave you with a small sample of images and videos showing how widely-varying the chemicals are:
Keep up the great work, Agent! Excellent posts. I so appreciate you!
Hi Agent, can I send you some photos I took last night of the night skies in Southeast, MO (Outside of Cape Girardeau)? These pictures capture the grid so well that you can see the grid lines and their intersections—almost perfect right angles. Im not sure what to do with them other than send them to you. Let me know if that's possible.