In Parts 1 and 2 of this series we discussed the plethora of terrorist hijacking drills ran by the entities designed to protect us over the fifteen months leading up to 9/11.
My favorite anonymous journalist! (Just started following within recent weeks and I already want to print all your articles…soon I will become a paid subscriber)
When the Prez was reading in the Florida classroom on the morning of, the children were instructed to say aloud five SPELLING words, which were shown clearly in the vid I had: "plane" "must" "hit" "kite" "steel" (in a different order.) Most references to these words have been scrubbed. "Kite" has multiple meanings that work in the context of the event.
Yes, they are scrubbing everything related to 9/11. Even on the website Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth....all their videos of the towers collapsing are no longer available.
These all look like "How to" manuals and instructions, practice runs for false flag events, also a way to obtain faux footage for false flag events. Nice little packages for the $MSM.
Sorry to be so cynical, but I find it best to be cynical.
It's great the info that's still remaining about that faux fateful day is being retrieved and woven into a coherent (and RL insane) narrative.
I recall reading an architecture mag in the 70s in which there was an advert showing the twin towers exploding near the top and a bit lower, respectively. Have read since that the WTC construction, which began in '68, had been designed to "come down." Also, 1968 was an important ritual year for the 2001 mega ritual with a 33-year apart secret handshake difference between the two, and, too, because that was the year when 911 emergency call service was established and seared into our collective consciousness.
Perhaps I passed over this in reading, but you might wish to sync the exact time the NRO disbanded and left their posts with the other times in your narrative. You note how many or most of the exercise participants thought the "real life" crashes were part of the scripted simulated scenario with some surprise off-script, but why did one important agency abandon their jobs, especially in the time of a national emergency? A timeline chart would be great, and perhaps you've already made one.
[Deleted last paragraph because my numbers on the plane timings were wrong. The conversion of 9-11 to 66 is still significant, along with an important Biblical meaning for the dark occultists: BOR 9:11: "They had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is called Apollyon". ]
Once upon a time there was a window maker who had a business that replaced broken windows to the shops in the local town. Business was slow. He tells his son to go out in the night and smash some rocks through many of the windows of the town shops. The next day, business is booming due to the artificially created demand.
The police state needs to create demand for "security" through mass marketing (staging and carrying out large scale events). How do you get folks to do strange rituals like put their shoes and belt in a tray at the airport, walk through a radiation zapper, wear a face diaper around town, or sign up to be a living QR code to move from place to place and conduct life business? You convince them it is necessary for their 'safety'. Herd management.
Look at the playbook:
1) For almost every single 'terrorist' event, there are at least one or several drills carried out prior to or actually live on the day of the event.
2) So some group/s of quasi-military/intelligence/govt. nexus creeps are dreaming up these scenarios ahead of time and "practicing" for them.
3) All the drills somehow actually come true as they are presented by the people on the TV.
4) Despite the purported intention of the tax payer-funded outfits to practice their dreamed up exercises, they fail miserably to prevent the crystal balled events. (They really suck at their jobs).
5) Each event artificially creates demand (or pacifying acceptance) of new sets of surveillance and control measures brought to you by the same police/defense groups who only appear to be good at predicting bad guy attacks... not stopping them.
Around in a perpetual loop we go...
If you put any of this shit on the 'news' (whether 100% artificial or not), most of the peasants will believe what they are seeing as it is being presented without a second thought. They do not possess the cognitive capacity to confront that the town window maker that they grew to love and trust is smashing all the town windows and stealing everything they've got.
I question whether it's the lack of cognitive power that stops people questioning. It certainly plays a part. I suspect it's fear (mostly subconscious) of self destruction (mostly through ego death) that is the bigger issue.
When so many people discover some level of truth they are still desperate to hang on to their old selves. They want to keep their political and religious beliefs which simply no longer match their new knowledge. Cognitively it's obvious these are also BS but it's just too hard to build yourself back up from scrstch. It's no different to kids discovering Santa isn't real but still believeing in the tooth fairy or magic Jesus.
Surely there is not one real person out there who actually believes. It's just the hole it leaves is too big. They just want to do desperately that......
I'm searching for a dinosaur article. Ie dinosaurs are not real. Does anyone know if the author is this journalists here? I remember it had me in stitches, and want to recommend it to others. Thanks.
I used an app called "9convert" to grab and download YT videos, and have collected (on my own SSD) many pertaining to 9/11. Interestingly, about two years ago, 9convert's functionality went away ... it no longer can capture YT video.
As I was reading your article on 9/11 I was writing down thoughts on it to send to Bob, the man who sent this article to me. Here they are for you to understand:
Dear Bob,
This article says that a plane would crash into the Statue of Liberty. What would be the point of doing that?
You’re old enough to remember that planes could be hijacked long before 9/11 ever happened. Right? That’s why the government built planes that could be remotely controlled. The first article I published exposing 9/11 was just that, a remotely controlled plane crashing into WTC1, the North Tower.
Susan Clarke wrote to the group that both planes that hit the WTC were military planes. I originally published that one of the planes was a military plane, no windows in military planes as opposed to passenger planes which have windows for the passenger planes. So right there, the government’s lies were exposed in my work which hardly anyone reads, even those who are in my Address Book.
This author wrote “…real-life 9/11 hijackers….” There were no hijackers on 9/11. My previous paragraphs in this reply make this very clear.
Moreover, Flight 77 didn’t fly on 9/11 according to LenHart who wrote the article about that issue. The government said that Flight 77 was the plane that hit the Pentagon, but that’s just another lie they told.
Rhetorical question: I wonder how many pay for this nonsense? I hope you don’t pay for it. Normally like Agent 11711’s articles, but this one is not accurate.
I mean here’s something else he wrote, “…taken over by terrorists.”
Google used to index my e-zine, but that ended years ago. So you would not see my coverage of 9/11 which is comprised of 128 articles or pieces of information beginning with my 4th edition an ending with my very last edition, the 37th which appeared in March 2012 with hardly an edition appearing that didn't have at least one item about 9/11 appearing, all of which is copyrighted.
You can see some video of the towers collapsing here, https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks. This substack is dedicated to proving that the Towers were brought down with a microwave weapon.
My favorite anonymous journalist! (Just started following within recent weeks and I already want to print all your articles…soon I will become a paid subscriber)
Ps, sorry for your eye health troubles! I would be trying to avoid the surgery route as well 😰
The following is a poor video recording, (but I can't find the one I saved along with a still of an interesting frame):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrZgtUtI0m8
When the Prez was reading in the Florida classroom on the morning of, the children were instructed to say aloud five SPELLING words, which were shown clearly in the vid I had: "plane" "must" "hit" "kite" "steel" (in a different order.) Most references to these words have been scrubbed. "Kite" has multiple meanings that work in the context of the event.
Yes, they are scrubbing everything related to 9/11. Even on the website Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth....all their videos of the towers collapsing are no longer available.
That's a problem, as 9/11A&E was an excellent, reliable, truthful source of info.
Some think they are controlled op because they think the towers came down with a vibration weapon, not controlled demolition.
They are a limited hangout. Very limited:).
Perhaps Agent can contact them for copies of what they posted?
I am glad I still have hard copies of many of those articles and even a couple of DVD's!
These all look like "How to" manuals and instructions, practice runs for false flag events, also a way to obtain faux footage for false flag events. Nice little packages for the $MSM.
Sorry to be so cynical, but I find it best to be cynical.
No one could imagine using aircraft ……. George W.
No one except the CIA...
Shhhh…mossad be listening 👂
They did their share.
It's great the info that's still remaining about that faux fateful day is being retrieved and woven into a coherent (and RL insane) narrative.
I recall reading an architecture mag in the 70s in which there was an advert showing the twin towers exploding near the top and a bit lower, respectively. Have read since that the WTC construction, which began in '68, had been designed to "come down." Also, 1968 was an important ritual year for the 2001 mega ritual with a 33-year apart secret handshake difference between the two, and, too, because that was the year when 911 emergency call service was established and seared into our collective consciousness.
Perhaps I passed over this in reading, but you might wish to sync the exact time the NRO disbanded and left their posts with the other times in your narrative. You note how many or most of the exercise participants thought the "real life" crashes were part of the scripted simulated scenario with some surprise off-script, but why did one important agency abandon their jobs, especially in the time of a national emergency? A timeline chart would be great, and perhaps you've already made one.
[Deleted last paragraph because my numbers on the plane timings were wrong. The conversion of 9-11 to 66 is still significant, along with an important Biblical meaning for the dark occultists: BOR 9:11: "They had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is called Apollyon". ]
Might I also add the The Book of Revelation is the last and 66th book in the Christian Bible?
Once upon a time there was a window maker who had a business that replaced broken windows to the shops in the local town. Business was slow. He tells his son to go out in the night and smash some rocks through many of the windows of the town shops. The next day, business is booming due to the artificially created demand.
The police state needs to create demand for "security" through mass marketing (staging and carrying out large scale events). How do you get folks to do strange rituals like put their shoes and belt in a tray at the airport, walk through a radiation zapper, wear a face diaper around town, or sign up to be a living QR code to move from place to place and conduct life business? You convince them it is necessary for their 'safety'. Herd management.
Look at the playbook:
1) For almost every single 'terrorist' event, there are at least one or several drills carried out prior to or actually live on the day of the event.
2) So some group/s of quasi-military/intelligence/govt. nexus creeps are dreaming up these scenarios ahead of time and "practicing" for them.
3) All the drills somehow actually come true as they are presented by the people on the TV.
4) Despite the purported intention of the tax payer-funded outfits to practice their dreamed up exercises, they fail miserably to prevent the crystal balled events. (They really suck at their jobs).
5) Each event artificially creates demand (or pacifying acceptance) of new sets of surveillance and control measures brought to you by the same police/defense groups who only appear to be good at predicting bad guy attacks... not stopping them.
Around in a perpetual loop we go...
If you put any of this shit on the 'news' (whether 100% artificial or not), most of the peasants will believe what they are seeing as it is being presented without a second thought. They do not possess the cognitive capacity to confront that the town window maker that they grew to love and trust is smashing all the town windows and stealing everything they've got.
I question whether it's the lack of cognitive power that stops people questioning. It certainly plays a part. I suspect it's fear (mostly subconscious) of self destruction (mostly through ego death) that is the bigger issue.
When so many people discover some level of truth they are still desperate to hang on to their old selves. They want to keep their political and religious beliefs which simply no longer match their new knowledge. Cognitively it's obvious these are also BS but it's just too hard to build yourself back up from scrstch. It's no different to kids discovering Santa isn't real but still believeing in the tooth fairy or magic Jesus.
Surely there is not one real person out there who actually believes. It's just the hole it leaves is too big. They just want to do desperately that......
So glad for your efforts and writing.
I was not in the habit of listening to the bogus news outlets from way back before this event.
I was just in the process of turning my truck radio off when I heard of the first plane supposedly flying into the first tower.
My first thought was, " I wonder why the Americans are bombing their own building".
It quickly became very obvious very soon after.
thanks for your work.
I'm searching for a dinosaur article. Ie dinosaurs are not real. Does anyone know if the author is this journalists here? I remember it had me in stitches, and want to recommend it to others. Thanks.
Here ya go https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/dinosaurs-are-fake-water-dinos-edition
First of a three-parter:).
Ohhohoho I can’t wait to delve into this one! 😍
Thank you, my Agent, for all your hard work!
Look into castor oil for cataracts, it may help you. Videos on YouTube.
I used an app called "9convert" to grab and download YT videos, and have collected (on my own SSD) many pertaining to 9/11. Interestingly, about two years ago, 9convert's functionality went away ... it no longer can capture YT video.
You are amazing!!! Thank you!
I cannot restack.
Great article.
As I was reading your article on 9/11 I was writing down thoughts on it to send to Bob, the man who sent this article to me. Here they are for you to understand:
Dear Bob,
This article says that a plane would crash into the Statue of Liberty. What would be the point of doing that?
You’re old enough to remember that planes could be hijacked long before 9/11 ever happened. Right? That’s why the government built planes that could be remotely controlled. The first article I published exposing 9/11 was just that, a remotely controlled plane crashing into WTC1, the North Tower.
Susan Clarke wrote to the group that both planes that hit the WTC were military planes. I originally published that one of the planes was a military plane, no windows in military planes as opposed to passenger planes which have windows for the passenger planes. So right there, the government’s lies were exposed in my work which hardly anyone reads, even those who are in my Address Book.
This author wrote “…real-life 9/11 hijackers….” There were no hijackers on 9/11. My previous paragraphs in this reply make this very clear.
Moreover, Flight 77 didn’t fly on 9/11 according to LenHart who wrote the article about that issue. The government said that Flight 77 was the plane that hit the Pentagon, but that’s just another lie they told.
Rhetorical question: I wonder how many pay for this nonsense? I hope you don’t pay for it. Normally like Agent 11711’s articles, but this one is not accurate.
I mean here’s something else he wrote, “…taken over by terrorists.”
Google used to index my e-zine, but that ended years ago. So you would not see my coverage of 9/11 which is comprised of 128 articles or pieces of information beginning with my 4th edition an ending with my very last edition, the 37th which appeared in March 2012 with hardly an edition appearing that didn't have at least one item about 9/11 appearing, all of which is copyrighted.
Peace,
Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net
To access my work, click on the icon that says Magazine.