North Carolina PLANNED FERTILITY REDUCTION Document: Cut Population Growth in HALF by 2000
A 1971 document exposes the fertility reduction program and how it will positively impact North Carolina...
A few people I know who work in the education industry have been telling me that they (the powers that be) are figuratively burning colleges to the ground. My associates report that the parking lots of universities are becoming empty due to lack of enrollment and they are concerned that the schools are going to go under. My thoughts on this are different.
I don’t think the institutions care if there is enrollment because these schools are no longer schools, they are government-funded and NGO-funded safehouses. Let me give you some examples: In 2018, federal money made up 14% of all college revenue. This is just government revenue for nonprofit private universities in one year, which includes government contracts:
These are learning institutions; places where young adults go to figure out what they want to do with their lives, yet they are getting paid to perform work for the government - am I the only one who finds this alarming? Whoever you accept funds from puts you under their control:
(which is exactly why this Substack will never have a sponsor and will instead 100% rely on donations and subscriptions.)
So, other than the government, who controls the universities? Well, to name a few, as of 2019, the Gates Foundation awarded $1.6 billion to universities. Then there’s the National Institute of Health (NIH) who, working under the Department of Health and Human Services, awarded $41 billion to colleges and universities (2018). The same year, the National Science Foundation gave an additional $11.2 billion to universities. Next, there’s the entities like the Rockefeller Foundation, who completely covers the cost of opening institutions within universities, such as the Montreal Neurological Institute at McGill University and the Institute for Psychoanalysis in Chicago. There are so many transactions that there is no way to ascertain the amount of funds and gifts being pumped into these places.
This leads one to ask “Why? Why are they giving these universities so much money?”. Answer: Because these “schools” are places were the Agendas can be brought to fruition with nobody questioning what the hell is going on behind closed classroom doors. Let me give you a couple examples of what is happening in these schools (I should probably write a full post on the topic, but for now, here you go):
Eugenics research was funded by philanthropies and carried out at prominent universities. Charles B. Davenport was the Professor of Zoology at the University of Chicago as well as the founder of the Eugenics Record Office. David Starr Jordan was President of Stanford University and chair of the Eugenics Committee. By 1928, 376 universities in the United States offered courses in eugenics.
As we discussed in The Sex Ed PSYOP series (specifically Part 3), “Alfred Kinsey was an American sexologist, biologist, and professor of entomology and zoology at Indiana University. He developed the horrifically perverted Kinsey Belief System which involved sex with minors, children enjoying sexual pleasure from adults and he emphasized the importance of early childhood sexual experiences for children to be “sexually healthy”. … “Alfred founded The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University. At the time it was called the Institute for Sex Research but it is now known as the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction.”. Rockefeller funded Kinsey and his studies. Kinsey was Hugh Hefner’s idol. Hugh did some history-changing things that most people don’t know about. If you haven’t read that series, you should.
In 2023, the University of Southern California got a $1.9 million dollar grant from the NIH. This grant involved drilling holes into the brains of mice then injecting their brains with “viruses”. - They call this Science, I call this torturous animal abuse.
Also in Cali, the University of California Irvine partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to help with a $4.3 million dollar grant from the NIH. This specific grant involved mice, rats and tree shrews. Like the SoCal experiments, these rodents would also have holes drilled into their skulls to allow for brain access. Their brains were injected with Herpes.
Microsoft co-founder, Paul Allen, from the Allen Institute and the NIH, sent almost $65 million to Wuhan China to fund a study that cut out baby mice’s brains.
The University of Florida was part of an NIH grant totaling almost $30 million. This grant funded creating a mutant malaria strain then injecting it into mice. The mice would then be offered as food to mosquitoes that had been starved.
If you look at papers on the CDC, NIH or NHS websites and scroll down to the bottom to see who was involved with the research, there’s often a university.
California Institute of Technology received $2.4 billion in federal contract funding from NASA (← who is flat out deceiving us with quite literally everything they are doing, read The Satellite Hoax series - by the way, I have since figured out exactly how they are running the satellite scam, satellite photos lie and the “satellite phone” half-truth. I already wrote the article, I just need to publish it. Spoiler alert: it’s not anything in “space”, they’re all in on it and your $40-a-month satellite phone can be easily shut off, I don’t care what they tell you, I have the documents.)
UW Madison offers degrees in geoengineering
Harvard offers a geoengineering program
Harvard also offers courses in AI
Just pick a famous University and look at their grants and funding and you will see that everything Agenda-driven traces back to some school. Point being, I don’t think these places care if they have empty parking lots as long as they have enough pupils to get paid to further The Plan.
With that being said, today we are going to look at a document I came across called, “Potential Socioeconomic Consequences of Planned Fertility Reduction”:
This document, which is actually more of a small book, was authored by the Carolina Population Center located at the University of North Carolina and was published in 1971:
Keep in mind, this document was published only two years after Rockefellers 1969 Beyond Family Planning document which outlined putting fertility reducing agents into the water supply and all kinds of other evil sh*t. Now let’s check Planned Fertility Reduction.
One sentence in their book is really interesting. Here’s exactly how it is written:
The basic objective of the majority of such studies has been the need to dramatize the impact of changes in fertility levels on certain socioeconomic indicators in order that “top” policy-makers may become “convinced” of the need to implement a national family planning and/or population planning program”
Creepy, eh? “top” policy-makers? Become “convinced”? That sounds like some underhanded sh*t to me. Here they outline the objective for the study:
They go on to write a series of important points regarding the planned fertility decline, you should read these, especially #7:
On page 56, we see a graph which shows the “number of births to be averted to achieve the assumed fertility decline” in North Carolina. Although the document was published in 1971, the graph starts at 1970 (left) and goes through the year 2000 (right). As you can see, they were planning a massive reduction in population, with the hardest hit being between 1975-1985:
They provide further detail on the impacts to the total population of North Carolina when the planned fertility decline program is fully implemented:
They go on to question if reducing population growth to an extreme is going to affect the amount of tax revenue generated by the citizens (because dead men don’t pay taxes). They decided that, although it will impact the amount being paid in, it will also help because it will reduce the amount of people on welfare and by reducing dependents. They state that there will still be population growth, it just won’t be as bad as if these measures are not taken.
On their Summary and Conclusions page, whoever had the book before me made a pen mark in it, which I agree is of interest:
The “30 year period” ends at the year 2000, which was exactly when the United Nations Agenda 21 was scheduled to go into effect; sustainable everything. And what is causing the world to not be sustainable? People.
I wanted to see what happened to the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina. I was surprised to discover that the entity is still open today. What are they doing these days? Running programs that advance the well-being of all people.
That was an overview of the 1970s document but KEEP READING BELOW, but first: Support truly independent journalism because us authors choose not to have sponsors and we do not have any products to sell you. 100% of our funding comes from people like you who want to raise awareness to the dire situation we are in.
NEXT READ
Secret POPULATION CONTROL Operations: Drug the Water Supply, Destroy the Family, Reduce Fertility (1969)
“Let us assume that today’s national family planning programs, mainly based on voluntary contraception, are not “enough” - when “enough” is defined not necessarily as achieving zero growth in some extended present but simply as lowering birth rates quickly and substantially
Truth About YOUR MICROWAVE: You Won't Believe Who ACTUALLY Invented it (Part 1)
We should have known all along that there was more to the story…
THE TAKEOVER OF HUMANITY, Disguised as TikTok CHALLENGES
Once you see it, you can never unsee it. These Social Media platforms are free for a reason…
PAYING FARMERS NOT TO FARM & TO DESTROY CROPS (Part 1)
I kept seeing videos like this, farmers claiming they are being paid to not farm or to destroy their crops: (1:22 video)
SOURCES, NOTES & OTHER STUFF
https://archive.org/details/potentialsocioec0000asda/page/n3/mode/2up
I save all the articles I read on my computer as a PDF, just Mouse right click in the Google browser > Print > Save as PDF. If, as with other sites, there is a lot of advertising, the desired text must be marked first
This comment is only about "academics" (I haven't read the rest yet):
"Academic research" is indeed ideological even in "hard sciences" (note: no such things exist, because even they are using tentative paradigms to interpret open systems in closed systems, and there are never two completely identical situations even for experiments). For more: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freaks-of-science).
During my 23 years of academic teaching, I witnessed grade inflation, too. By about 2001, it was clear that if I had failed all the students who didn't do the job, there would have been about three out of ten students left, whose tuition (mostly student loans, apparently "guaranteed" by the taxpayer these days) would pay my salary, so I would be soon out of a job (obviously I was not at MIT or Harvard). My failing rates were still around 40 percent, despite using a system in which every student was allowed to develop their own projects, and were not tested for anything that I was not teaching, while I limited my materials to the easily doable. I usually handed out Incompletes, and my students had another semester to complete their work, but out of thousands, I believe, only two or three ever earned a passing grade (Incompletes automatically turn into Fs after a semester). The good news is that no student ever complained.