PART 3: To learn how the sausage is made, we look at a recipe for making sausage. To learn how to fake space, we look at the companies faking it and learn how they do it. Fascinating stuff!
Decades ago, I worked in the space program. I was an undegrad and worked with tenured profs and PhDs in the Physics Department and wrote code, which I posted online.
It is entirely very easy to orchestrate such a grand deception. Hyperspecialization and money can accomplish much. I haven't paid yet to read the entire Part 4 or comment there yet, but I think I will. Nice work!
Given the subject matter behind the paywall for that part, consider this. There are two great clubs in the world. The Space Club, you obviously know about and peered your penetrating gaze upon.
There is also the Nuke Club, which needs a very penetrating gaze to pierce its veil. Nuclear power is real (they're just "hot rocks" as a well-known personality labeled them). Weapons..."it's best to act as if they exist," one well-known physicist at Caltech said publicly. It's well worth looking into.
If you scroll down to where it says "See Mars-Like Dunes: Sossusvlei Desert Lodge | Namibia," you'll see a landscape quite reminiscent of Mars Rover pics (*not photos).
I'm completely onboard with there being psyops galore - every day, there's little ones, frequently, midsized ones and relatively frequently, big ones. They psyop and psyop and psyop and psyop us. The Challenger disaster is probably the most brazen of all time with the alleged dead walking around bold as brass carrying the same, if not very similar, names or claiming to be a sibling. I mean, you just cannot believe it.
The massive amounts of purported evidence for the moon landings is both internally consistent and consistent with expectations considering the alien lunar conditions and there is simply no reason to doubt them.
They wanted to go to the moon, they worked out how to do it, they went.
All the seeming anomalies have been explained. Yes, of course, I'm familiar with the complete bunkum produced by so-called fact-checkers and their ilk. Yes, I know most alleged debunking is nothing of the sort but when it comes to the moon landings the debunking stands up to scrutiny.
Where we do see clear evidence of a psyop is in those prominent saying we didn't go such as the cartoonish Bill Kaysing and Dave McGowan, author of Wagging the Moondoggie which I was initially very persuaded by but whose seeming case for fakery I rejected when I went to examine the evidence myself notably the audio recordings between the astronauts and mission control which seemed perfectly authentic unlike the the bogusly-named "oral" histories of the 9/11 firefighters which had no audio to support them, only alleged "transcripts" full of nonsensicality and the audio of Collateral Murder used by former Bradley Manning to infiltrate Wikileaks, clearly displaying signs of being a fake comprising stitched together snippets of genuine audio.
NASA regulation book: Rule 23 - No beans should be consumed within 2 days of filming under water.
Your curiosity and tenacity are remarkable! Thank you for peeling back endless layers of B.S.
Great post brother.
Decades ago, I worked in the space program. I was an undegrad and worked with tenured profs and PhDs in the Physics Department and wrote code, which I posted online.
It is entirely very easy to orchestrate such a grand deception. Hyperspecialization and money can accomplish much. I haven't paid yet to read the entire Part 4 or comment there yet, but I think I will. Nice work!
Given the subject matter behind the paywall for that part, consider this. There are two great clubs in the world. The Space Club, you obviously know about and peered your penetrating gaze upon.
There is also the Nuke Club, which needs a very penetrating gaze to pierce its veil. Nuclear power is real (they're just "hot rocks" as a well-known personality labeled them). Weapons..."it's best to act as if they exist," one well-known physicist at Caltech said publicly. It's well worth looking into.
A woman who also has a keen investigative eye wrote this penetrating post just over a year, after I suggested she dig deeper.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230226075031/https://rivkalevy.com/irans-nuke-another-big-fake/
Would not surprise me if NASA is behind the Eclipse and tail comet in Texas..
If you scroll down to where it says "See Mars-Like Dunes: Sossusvlei Desert Lodge | Namibia," you'll see a landscape quite reminiscent of Mars Rover pics (*not photos).
https://nicenews.com/culture/unusual-hotels-around-the-world/
I'm completely onboard with there being psyops galore - every day, there's little ones, frequently, midsized ones and relatively frequently, big ones. They psyop and psyop and psyop and psyop us. The Challenger disaster is probably the most brazen of all time with the alleged dead walking around bold as brass carrying the same, if not very similar, names or claiming to be a sibling. I mean, you just cannot believe it.
https://fakeotube.com/video/3665/nasa-challenger-crew-alive
However:
The massive amounts of purported evidence for the moon landings is both internally consistent and consistent with expectations considering the alien lunar conditions and there is simply no reason to doubt them.
They wanted to go to the moon, they worked out how to do it, they went.
All the seeming anomalies have been explained. Yes, of course, I'm familiar with the complete bunkum produced by so-called fact-checkers and their ilk. Yes, I know most alleged debunking is nothing of the sort but when it comes to the moon landings the debunking stands up to scrutiny.
Where we do see clear evidence of a psyop is in those prominent saying we didn't go such as the cartoonish Bill Kaysing and Dave McGowan, author of Wagging the Moondoggie which I was initially very persuaded by but whose seeming case for fakery I rejected when I went to examine the evidence myself notably the audio recordings between the astronauts and mission control which seemed perfectly authentic unlike the the bogusly-named "oral" histories of the 9/11 firefighters which had no audio to support them, only alleged "transcripts" full of nonsensicality and the audio of Collateral Murder used by former Bradley Manning to infiltrate Wikileaks, clearly displaying signs of being a fake comprising stitched together snippets of genuine audio.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/nonsensicalities-in-the-911-firefighter
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/chelsea-manning-agent-collateral
If you think the moon landings were faked I put to you that you haven't looked at the evidence properly.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/american-moon-2017-superficially