"Better a cruel truth than a comfortable delusion" -Edward Abbey
Indeed, so let me take a closer look, but only a little bit.
Not sure where the "Jesuit oath" comes from. I have known Jesuits, and can assure everyone such an oath does not exist. The same applies to "heretics must be burnt." It is the secular powers that confiscated heretics' possessions and, thus, were financially involved in the process.
Also, the visible "enemies" are most likely decoys:
Jesuits and Freemasons and Illuminati are essentially the same entity. They all have oaths which ensure a painful, torturous death on the event of their breaking. This is where concepts like "The Unbreakable Vow" originate. They do take such oaths, whether or not the one presented is accurate.
The slavers were mostly Jews. That does not exclude any Freemasonic society, but a Jew is, first & foremost, a Jew.
In my understanding, they are not the same, but while the Jesuit order was infiltrated in the second half of the 19th century, 33rd-degree Masons were insiders (they are always invited, not promoted), while the "Illuminati" seem more like Romantic lore. Still, all three categories are used as decoys (as I explain it in the link in my previous comment), but here is more:
The "variations" you see are but illusions to dupe those who do not wish to realize they are one. Much like the Republican/Conservative & Democratic/Liberal parties in America. Their core goals, values, & purpose are the same. Who they worship (all of them are religions) is the same. Any "differences" are simply to cast a wider net.
Summary: Illuminati, Freemasons & Jesuits – Fact vs. Fiction
Sabbatai Zevi, Jacob Frank, Rothschilds – The article links them to the Illuminati. In reality, Zevi (17th c.) and Frank (18th c.) were Jewish religious figures, while the Rothschild banking dynasty emerged later in Frankfurt. No evidence of collaboration with Adam Weishaupt or the Illuminati.
Adam Weishaupt – The article says he was Jewish and funded by Rothschilds. In fact, Weishaupt (1748–1830) was a Catholic professor of law. He founded the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776 on his own. No proof of Rothschild involvement.
Jesuit Oath – The violent “oath” quoted is a 17th–19th century forgery, spread in anti-Catholic propaganda. Real Jesuit vows are poverty, chastity, obedience, and (for some) special obedience to the Pope.
Carroll Family (Maryland) – Portrayed as Jesuit slave-masters. Charles Carroll was a Catholic signer of the Declaration of Independence, not a Jesuit. Jesuits in Maryland did own slaves, but that is separate from the Carroll family.
Benjamin Franklin – The article ties him to the “Hellfire Club” and Satanism. Franklin was indeed a Freemason and Grand Master in Pennsylvania. He visited Sir Francis Dashwood’s estate in England but was not a member of the Hellfire Club, nor is there evidence of “satanism.”
Moses Mendelssohn – The article calls him an Illuminati leader, friend of Humboldt and Wistar, and claims he changed his name to sound less Jewish. In reality, Mendelssohn (1729–1786) was a Jewish philosopher, not an Illuminati member. His surname is a standard patronymic. He died before Humboldt’s career began and had no connection with Wistar.
Edward Jenner & vaccination – The article describes “torturing calves” and “horse grease” injections. Historically, Jenner pioneered vaccination with cowpox virus. Early trials with “horse grease” existed but were not his main method. Vaccination was crude by modern standards but saved countless lives from smallpox.
Illuminati infiltration – While Weishaupt did recruit some Freemasons, the Illuminati were banned by 1785. They never controlled Freemasonry, the Jesuits, or world governments.
Hamilton & Jefferson – Claims that Hamilton was Jewish and Jefferson a disciple of Weishaupt are baseless. Hamilton was not Jewish; Jefferson knew Humboldt and other intellectuals but had no link to Weishaupt.
📌 Conclusion:
The article mixes real names and events with fabrications, forgeries, and conspiracy interpretations. It recycles 19th-century anti-Catholic and antisemitic propaganda, giving the impression of a secret “Illuminati-Jesuit-Masonic” world order without historical evidence.
Thank you so much for sparing me the effort to correct some of the more obvious errors in this article you have listed. Except - after intense research into the history of vaccination especially against small pox i sincerly must doubt that Jenners vaccination has saved "countless lives". In short there are several factors to take into account before reaching such a conclusion. For one, doctors and officials were as quick to falsify statistics as they are today. 2) The method to prove the vaccine worked was to vaccinate a subject with cowpox slime (but also as was mentioned sometimes with horse grease, and on occasions even mixing cowpox and horsegrease, until someone told Jenner: "For god´s sake, leave the horse out!"). Then wait for the infection which was hopefully harmless. Apply the real smallpox after a period of sometimes only five weeks. If the proband didn´t get ill, that was proof, the person was immune. The problem is there are quite a lot examples of people who got the small pox at another time in spite of vaccination. Small pox were sometimes more virulent than at other times. And so on, it´s not easy to really prove the old method was actually saving lives.
Minor error: Elizabeth I banished Jesuits in 1585. You dated the event to the article published in 1745 (which must have been some retrospective article). George II was king in 1745.
Something I think you missed (it's an easy thing to miss, so don't think I'm disparaging your quality of research), is that the Jews created the secret societies (of which we have proof, from their own mouths) & Catholicism (no hard evidence that I've found, but the RCC has Talmudist written all over it, including the skull caps worn by both). As such, the Jews didn't infiltrate - they had no need! - they made a convincing show of it.
Then again, you may have covered this in the first part of this series, which I'm eager for the day I can read all your paywalled content.
Oh, and something you mentioned about researching in one of your vaccines articles - bear in mind that different people get different results. I did deep research on them and had gone from pro- to more-than-anti-jabs based on what I uncovered...and that's nothing remotely close to the filth you found. Thanks to your dedication, I'm even more informed than before.
Mayer Amschel Bauer, father of the Rothschild sons, was born 1744, he started dealing with coins around 1763. He would become court jew of Wilhelm von Hessen, Graf von Hanau (near Frankfurt) 1769. The duke´s grandfather was the guy who rented his soldiers to the english crown against the american revolution. But, living as a Jew in Frankfurt was no fun during these times. All jews (well there may have been very few exceptions) were restricted to the Judengasse and were not allowed to leave the quarter at night, had to make way if any non-jew said "Mach Mores, Jud!" and so on. Up to the time of the french revolution jews were rarely to be found in any freemason lodge in Germany, specially in Frankfurt (the situation in Austria, England and France was different). Weishaupt´s central activity took place in bavaria, still in 1781 there was no sign of any jew at all within the Illuminati, which can be proven by a memberlist.
Adam Weishaupt - there is no question he was fighting the jesuits and the church at the university in Ingolstadt and elsewhere furiously, even printing books attacking their influence. Citations of Weishaupt are completeley out of context. Remember, in Bavaria and Austria these were still times of monarchs with almost absolute power (absolutism) backed by the pope in Rome. In the 17th century bavaria had seen abhorrible examples of which hunting and burning - handled by Jesuits. After reading parts of Weishaupt´s book published 1790 I am absolutely certain, he was part of the enlightment movement, for example was Goethe for a short while member. Weishaupt saw a Jesuit conspiracy and wanted to counter it with his own conspiracy. But it didn´t work out as he thought, later on his plans were copied from persons with more sinister plans in mind. Weishaupt was not happy with the way for example von Knigge was luring members of other lodges into the Illuminati.
While reading your article I sometimes got the impression may be you mix up the bavarian Illuminati with the french illuminisme which was a freemason system introduced by Willermoz around 1768. As the bavarian Illuminati were founded 1776, only a very small secretive group in the beginning, how would Weishaupt have had anything to do with the american revolution?
I befriended this guy and it turns out his family is connected to the highest levels of government in my state, some members had even run unsuccessfully to win their party's nomination for President. He joined the Jesuit Volunteer Corps after college. Would you infer my buddy is being groomed by the Illuminati?
The proclamation in the London Gazette of December 10th 1745 was issued by King George II. He appears to be activating an existing law against Jesuits and Papists from an Act of Parliament made in the 27th year of the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. Since she acceded to the throne on 17 November 1558, the original legislation would have been passed between 17 November 1584 and 16 November 1585.
As many intrepid history students may recall, JFK told the American people:"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society..." And yet, there can be no con's-piracy without secrecy. Total control remains the desired goal of the illuminaztis.
There’s a glaring fact failure in this article re the reigning dates for QE1. This is exacerbated by the obviously false “newspaper” articles listing the dates of her reign to the 1700s. Either the dates recorded by our history are wrong or evidence has been “manufactured “ in this article. Hopefully this is not the case.
Masons and Jews everywhere and not a rope to be had. Great article!
"Better a cruel truth than a comfortable delusion" -Edward Abbey
Indeed, so let me take a closer look, but only a little bit.
Not sure where the "Jesuit oath" comes from. I have known Jesuits, and can assure everyone such an oath does not exist. The same applies to "heretics must be burnt." It is the secular powers that confiscated heretics' possessions and, thus, were financially involved in the process.
Also, the visible "enemies" are most likely decoys:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-open-message-deception
The slave-traders mostly operated from Porto and Amsterdam, and were not exactly Masons or, horibile dictu, Jesuits! :)
Jesuits and Freemasons and Illuminati are essentially the same entity. They all have oaths which ensure a painful, torturous death on the event of their breaking. This is where concepts like "The Unbreakable Vow" originate. They do take such oaths, whether or not the one presented is accurate.
The slavers were mostly Jews. That does not exclude any Freemasonic society, but a Jew is, first & foremost, a Jew.
In my understanding, they are not the same, but while the Jesuit order was infiltrated in the second half of the 19th century, 33rd-degree Masons were insiders (they are always invited, not promoted), while the "Illuminati" seem more like Romantic lore. Still, all three categories are used as decoys (as I explain it in the link in my previous comment), but here is more:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/finalizing-who-is-responsible
Just like Masons varied a great deal at the time, so were Jews (which is still the case), so no accurate designation is being made...
The "variations" you see are but illusions to dupe those who do not wish to realize they are one. Much like the Republican/Conservative & Democratic/Liberal parties in America. Their core goals, values, & purpose are the same. Who they worship (all of them are religions) is the same. Any "differences" are simply to cast a wider net.
That's exactly what I said about decoys:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-open-message-deception
Summary: Illuminati, Freemasons & Jesuits – Fact vs. Fiction
Sabbatai Zevi, Jacob Frank, Rothschilds – The article links them to the Illuminati. In reality, Zevi (17th c.) and Frank (18th c.) were Jewish religious figures, while the Rothschild banking dynasty emerged later in Frankfurt. No evidence of collaboration with Adam Weishaupt or the Illuminati.
Adam Weishaupt – The article says he was Jewish and funded by Rothschilds. In fact, Weishaupt (1748–1830) was a Catholic professor of law. He founded the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776 on his own. No proof of Rothschild involvement.
Jesuit Oath – The violent “oath” quoted is a 17th–19th century forgery, spread in anti-Catholic propaganda. Real Jesuit vows are poverty, chastity, obedience, and (for some) special obedience to the Pope.
Carroll Family (Maryland) – Portrayed as Jesuit slave-masters. Charles Carroll was a Catholic signer of the Declaration of Independence, not a Jesuit. Jesuits in Maryland did own slaves, but that is separate from the Carroll family.
Benjamin Franklin – The article ties him to the “Hellfire Club” and Satanism. Franklin was indeed a Freemason and Grand Master in Pennsylvania. He visited Sir Francis Dashwood’s estate in England but was not a member of the Hellfire Club, nor is there evidence of “satanism.”
Moses Mendelssohn – The article calls him an Illuminati leader, friend of Humboldt and Wistar, and claims he changed his name to sound less Jewish. In reality, Mendelssohn (1729–1786) was a Jewish philosopher, not an Illuminati member. His surname is a standard patronymic. He died before Humboldt’s career began and had no connection with Wistar.
Edward Jenner & vaccination – The article describes “torturing calves” and “horse grease” injections. Historically, Jenner pioneered vaccination with cowpox virus. Early trials with “horse grease” existed but were not his main method. Vaccination was crude by modern standards but saved countless lives from smallpox.
Illuminati infiltration – While Weishaupt did recruit some Freemasons, the Illuminati were banned by 1785. They never controlled Freemasonry, the Jesuits, or world governments.
Hamilton & Jefferson – Claims that Hamilton was Jewish and Jefferson a disciple of Weishaupt are baseless. Hamilton was not Jewish; Jefferson knew Humboldt and other intellectuals but had no link to Weishaupt.
📌 Conclusion:
The article mixes real names and events with fabrications, forgeries, and conspiracy interpretations. It recycles 19th-century anti-Catholic and antisemitic propaganda, giving the impression of a secret “Illuminati-Jesuit-Masonic” world order without historical evidence.
Thank you so much for sparing me the effort to correct some of the more obvious errors in this article you have listed. Except - after intense research into the history of vaccination especially against small pox i sincerly must doubt that Jenners vaccination has saved "countless lives". In short there are several factors to take into account before reaching such a conclusion. For one, doctors and officials were as quick to falsify statistics as they are today. 2) The method to prove the vaccine worked was to vaccinate a subject with cowpox slime (but also as was mentioned sometimes with horse grease, and on occasions even mixing cowpox and horsegrease, until someone told Jenner: "For god´s sake, leave the horse out!"). Then wait for the infection which was hopefully harmless. Apply the real smallpox after a period of sometimes only five weeks. If the proband didn´t get ill, that was proof, the person was immune. The problem is there are quite a lot examples of people who got the small pox at another time in spite of vaccination. Small pox were sometimes more virulent than at other times. And so on, it´s not easy to really prove the old method was actually saving lives.
Minor error: Elizabeth I banished Jesuits in 1585. You dated the event to the article published in 1745 (which must have been some retrospective article). George II was king in 1745.
Something I think you missed (it's an easy thing to miss, so don't think I'm disparaging your quality of research), is that the Jews created the secret societies (of which we have proof, from their own mouths) & Catholicism (no hard evidence that I've found, but the RCC has Talmudist written all over it, including the skull caps worn by both). As such, the Jews didn't infiltrate - they had no need! - they made a convincing show of it.
Then again, you may have covered this in the first part of this series, which I'm eager for the day I can read all your paywalled content.
Oh, and something you mentioned about researching in one of your vaccines articles - bear in mind that different people get different results. I did deep research on them and had gone from pro- to more-than-anti-jabs based on what I uncovered...and that's nothing remotely close to the filth you found. Thanks to your dedication, I'm even more informed than before.
WOW! My father was a Mason. I have his Masonic Bible. Holy $💩
I would suggest taking pictures of any non-Biblical places (such as Egyptian depictions) & burning it afterward. I would not keep such a book.
https://substack.com/profile/67437199-friar-tuck/note/c-161428085?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
The Secret Freemason Plan to Summon the Antichrist
End Times Productions
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GuPZ5nAFjVc
Freemasons are a buncha liars and creeps.
Mayer Amschel Bauer, father of the Rothschild sons, was born 1744, he started dealing with coins around 1763. He would become court jew of Wilhelm von Hessen, Graf von Hanau (near Frankfurt) 1769. The duke´s grandfather was the guy who rented his soldiers to the english crown against the american revolution. But, living as a Jew in Frankfurt was no fun during these times. All jews (well there may have been very few exceptions) were restricted to the Judengasse and were not allowed to leave the quarter at night, had to make way if any non-jew said "Mach Mores, Jud!" and so on. Up to the time of the french revolution jews were rarely to be found in any freemason lodge in Germany, specially in Frankfurt (the situation in Austria, England and France was different). Weishaupt´s central activity took place in bavaria, still in 1781 there was no sign of any jew at all within the Illuminati, which can be proven by a memberlist.
Adam Weishaupt - there is no question he was fighting the jesuits and the church at the university in Ingolstadt and elsewhere furiously, even printing books attacking their influence. Citations of Weishaupt are completeley out of context. Remember, in Bavaria and Austria these were still times of monarchs with almost absolute power (absolutism) backed by the pope in Rome. In the 17th century bavaria had seen abhorrible examples of which hunting and burning - handled by Jesuits. After reading parts of Weishaupt´s book published 1790 I am absolutely certain, he was part of the enlightment movement, for example was Goethe for a short while member. Weishaupt saw a Jesuit conspiracy and wanted to counter it with his own conspiracy. But it didn´t work out as he thought, later on his plans were copied from persons with more sinister plans in mind. Weishaupt was not happy with the way for example von Knigge was luring members of other lodges into the Illuminati.
While reading your article I sometimes got the impression may be you mix up the bavarian Illuminati with the french illuminisme which was a freemason system introduced by Willermoz around 1768. As the bavarian Illuminati were founded 1776, only a very small secretive group in the beginning, how would Weishaupt have had anything to do with the american revolution?
I befriended this guy and it turns out his family is connected to the highest levels of government in my state, some members had even run unsuccessfully to win their party's nomination for President. He joined the Jesuit Volunteer Corps after college. Would you infer my buddy is being groomed by the Illuminati?
The proclamation in the London Gazette of December 10th 1745 was issued by King George II. He appears to be activating an existing law against Jesuits and Papists from an Act of Parliament made in the 27th year of the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. Since she acceded to the throne on 17 November 1558, the original legislation would have been passed between 17 November 1584 and 16 November 1585.
Queen Elizabeth died in 1603. How could she have banned the Jesuits in 1745?
“they were banned from England by Queen Elizabeth in 1745.”
As many intrepid history students may recall, JFK told the American people:"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society..." And yet, there can be no con's-piracy without secrecy. Total control remains the desired goal of the illuminaztis.
The Black Nobility , Vatican Grey Pope Pepe Orsini and the Chabad Jews all run together ,the Freemasons 33 plus do much of their dirty work
There’s a glaring fact failure in this article re the reigning dates for QE1. This is exacerbated by the obviously false “newspaper” articles listing the dates of her reign to the 1700s. Either the dates recorded by our history are wrong or evidence has been “manufactured “ in this article. Hopefully this is not the case.