People getting rid of their refuse by throwing it out their car windows because the wind will blow it “away”. Therefore it’s no longer a problem.
Bees and fireflies disappear from suburban lawns.
The ivory billed woodpecker is declared extinct.
Pull tabs from pop and beer cans litter all the beaches, creating an unsightly mess and cutting people’s feet when they walk through the sand barefoot.
Remember all that?
I do.
These were among the catalysts for the environmental movement. There were many more, but these particular problems brought the issue to the public’s consciousness more than most.
Now consider that if you visit some areas of the country, like eastern Idaho and Washington, you’ll notice that most of the homes built before the mid-1980’s or so have no air conditioning. That was because the average climate was such that nobody needed it. Now, those same homes are harder to sell because it’s become so hot there that nobody wants to live without air conditioning. Do you think that’s because people have become really wimpy and more demanding, or because on average the mercury’s actually gone up a few degrees?
The statement you presented from Gorbachev, who was a new-generation, and much more reasonable, Russian leader, could be read in two ways: either as a threat, or a warning. It could be situated in the context of telegraphing actual globalist ambitions, or as advice on how to play into the hands of the globalists (or not, if we change our ways). I choose to view it as the latter because, as I explained in my last post, our own excesses and refusal to take responsibility for maintaining a balance with our planetary life support system (see my above list of disasters) created fertile ground for globalist overrrach.
We always talk about the evil environmental “agenda” and who’s behind it (Gates, Schwab, Soros, etc.) Strangely, we never talk about the anti-environmental agenda and who’s behind THAT (the Koch’s? The Cheneys? Who else? Big Everything is certainly on this bandwagon, so the banks and leadership must be funding it somehow.) We simply take it as a given, “Trust the anti-environmentalists” like the sheeple “trusted the science” The biocidal agenda must not be questioned!! If you DO dare challenge it, you must be a hater of liberty, free speech, property rights, our Consitution, God and The American Way. You couldn’t possibly be just a thoughtful person who supports the TRUE rebels who have figured out how to plow and ranch our way out of this, and are trying to point out how, in resisting transition to regenerative ag, and genuine environmental sustainability, we’ve helped deliver ourselves to the globalists.
I’m sure Gorbachev was no saint, and I would never accuse Russia of being a concerned friend of the environment or of humanity overall. But there is paranoia, greed, duplicity, ignorance, lack of insight and inability to listen on BOTH sides of the aisle. And in the middle are all sorts of people all over the world doing amazing work like replanting damaged forests, replenishing dwindling species, reclaiming deserts, cleaning up filthy waterways and, yes, raising food plants and animals while helping the earth to thrive instead of stripping her to her bones. What would have happened if we had been steadfastly following and supporting THOSE people all this time instead of letting our base appetites dictate that we blindly accept the degraded products and experience handed to us by those who profit from stripping the earth and then blaming and murdering or enslaving us?
It’s so frustrating to know that so many people saw thru the convid scam, but can’t apply the same skepticism and critical thinking to see thru the biocide scam.
So, hear me out.
Love canal.
Cuyahoga river catches on fire.
City streets awash in trash.
People getting rid of their refuse by throwing it out their car windows because the wind will blow it “away”. Therefore it’s no longer a problem.
Bees and fireflies disappear from suburban lawns.
The ivory billed woodpecker is declared extinct.
Pull tabs from pop and beer cans litter all the beaches, creating an unsightly mess and cutting people’s feet when they walk through the sand barefoot.
Remember all that?
I do.
These were among the catalysts for the environmental movement. There were many more, but these particular problems brought the issue to the public’s consciousness more than most.
Now consider that if you visit some areas of the country, like eastern Idaho and Washington, you’ll notice that most of the homes built before the mid-1980’s or so have no air conditioning. That was because the average climate was such that nobody needed it. Now, those same homes are harder to sell because it’s become so hot there that nobody wants to live without air conditioning. Do you think that’s because people have become really wimpy and more demanding, or because on average the mercury’s actually gone up a few degrees?
The statement you presented from Gorbachev, who was a new-generation, and much more reasonable, Russian leader, could be read in two ways: either as a threat, or a warning. It could be situated in the context of telegraphing actual globalist ambitions, or as advice on how to play into the hands of the globalists (or not, if we change our ways). I choose to view it as the latter because, as I explained in my last post, our own excesses and refusal to take responsibility for maintaining a balance with our planetary life support system (see my above list of disasters) created fertile ground for globalist overrrach.
We always talk about the evil environmental “agenda” and who’s behind it (Gates, Schwab, Soros, etc.) Strangely, we never talk about the anti-environmental agenda and who’s behind THAT (the Koch’s? The Cheneys? Who else? Big Everything is certainly on this bandwagon, so the banks and leadership must be funding it somehow.) We simply take it as a given, “Trust the anti-environmentalists” like the sheeple “trusted the science” The biocidal agenda must not be questioned!! If you DO dare challenge it, you must be a hater of liberty, free speech, property rights, our Consitution, God and The American Way. You couldn’t possibly be just a thoughtful person who supports the TRUE rebels who have figured out how to plow and ranch our way out of this, and are trying to point out how, in resisting transition to regenerative ag, and genuine environmental sustainability, we’ve helped deliver ourselves to the globalists.
I’m sure Gorbachev was no saint, and I would never accuse Russia of being a concerned friend of the environment or of humanity overall. But there is paranoia, greed, duplicity, ignorance, lack of insight and inability to listen on BOTH sides of the aisle. And in the middle are all sorts of people all over the world doing amazing work like replanting damaged forests, replenishing dwindling species, reclaiming deserts, cleaning up filthy waterways and, yes, raising food plants and animals while helping the earth to thrive instead of stripping her to her bones. What would have happened if we had been steadfastly following and supporting THOSE people all this time instead of letting our base appetites dictate that we blindly accept the degraded products and experience handed to us by those who profit from stripping the earth and then blaming and murdering or enslaving us?
It’s so frustrating to know that so many people saw thru the convid scam, but can’t apply the same skepticism and critical thinking to see thru the biocide scam.
People are so infantile they just want a side to choose in order to "belong".
No brains attached. They just get in the way.
Thank you for your comment.
Agreed. And thank you for your kind words. Much appreciated.