A true story of how NASA, the CIA and Santa Claus pulled off the unthinkable. (Yes, Santa Claus, because when it comes to the government, the truth really is stranger than fiction...)
In 1988/9 I worked for Dr Elisabeth Muller, the inventor of Inmarsat (International Maritime Satellite). I was her speech-writer and PA. We were selling the information gathered from every Lloyds Agent located at all airports and shipping ports worldwide. Our customers were governments and Agencies like the CIA. We communicated via an early form of email as she jetted around the world selling the system. Obviously, being based in an office in the City of London, I never actually saw the satellite which relayed all the communications between Lloyds Agents and our communications hub in London. It never crossed my mind to doubt the existence of the thing. Nowadays there are several Inmarsat satellites operating in orbit and they provide the world's government (plus the exceedingly wealthy) with an alternative and exclusive, very expensive internet. They are proud to provide telecoms and internet to superyachts and private aircraft. They are also advertising that they are taking part in the Internet of Things. There is some skulduggery going on, it is unclear who owns what now..... some takeovers and name changes having occurred.
The City of London (one square mile) is an independent state within the UK. So is the Vatican and Washington DC. These are the three lairs of the Black Nobility. They each have their own laws, police force and are not answerable to the countries they exist within.
fascinating!.. I just took in the 1st 20 minutes and have learned volumes of,. of things that we clearly see going on in the world.. Rome running spirituality (with their baal worshippers in control); London running finance (Making perfect sense - the queen was said to have been worth trillions..) and WDC running the military; Look at Trump.. he no sooner got into office than he began accusing Iran of terrorist acts (the pot always calling the kettle black).. and promised to uptick trade with Turkey from $20,000,000 to $100,000,000 by selling them WEAPONS systems.. (notably with IRAN the only middle eastern nation left standing that is also on General Wesley Clark's expose list of nations we mean to 'take down'.)
It is also perfectly clear from the last several years, that eugenics is on the top burner, seeing as wars may be fought now without boots on the ground (as we have seen in Gaza and Syria), and by emptying countries.. killing off their populations,.. as we have in Iraq, Ukraine, Russia, Syria, Lebanon, and African nations, they can steal all the natural resources, oil, and wealth of the nations.
Does anyone suppose the Church will ever pay attention to the writing on the wall? In Army Intelligence we had an expression that we were the 'FIRST to know, but the 'last to GO'.. Where as the Marine Corps was the 'Last to know, but the First to go'..
I would have to say that the Church is the last to know.. Which makes the black nobility's job of killing the masses, that much easier.
When you say 'the Church' do you mean the parishioners? The fact is that the Cardinals and Popes of the Roman Catholic Church have always been 'in the know' behind closed doors. Most of them, over history, have been from Black Nobility families and fully aware of the totalitarian nature of their organisation which is merely the mind control division of the clandestine Roman Empire!
Your reporting is the best spy satellite exposing the Freemason US Government lying to the world over the past 80 years. I wonder what payload is actually being thrust into space on a regular basis by NASA and Space X if the βhigh-tech satellitesβ America is manufacturing only require a balloon to launch them into space. π€
You push out masses of evidence to support your argument without doing due diligence to check your hypothesis is correct. Why not ask around a bit first. Quora is one place you can go.
You simply need to zoom in to see planes in airports, the same for cars. This is Sydney airport zoomed in on Google maps. (When you zoom out you can't see the planes nor the cars.)
The following question has been asked and answered in Quora:
When watching videos or pictures of the Earth from satellites in low orbit, why can't we see airplanes flying at a high altitude? We see clouds and land masses plainly, right?
The second response provides three satellite images of the same location at different levels of zoom. You can actually see a plane but only when the image is zoomed in more.
Like you, my sister doesn't believe in satellites and her "method" reminds me of yours. She decides what's what on a limited amount of information. Aim to prove your hypothesis wrong as best you can first before gathering mountains of evidence to support your case.
Elephant hurling, genetic fallacy, special pleading, personal incredulity and others. Discarding assumptions when conducting investigatons goes both ways. If at any point in the timeline a false conclusion propells things forward then it's a search for more selective evidence with inbuilt conclusions. That withstanding I respect all truthers and skeptics for having the courage to question anything and everything.
Truthers have everything against them at the outset. We really do need to do our utmost not to become "useful idiots" by ensuring anything we call fake really is and I don't think Agent puts enough effort in that direction.
I highly respect all curious people and Agent has done solid work, and made me question some things so I won't be guilty of genetic fallacy myself. It's difficult to know the truth of many topics or even begin to investigate, but those who undertake the journey have my respect. The assumptions being discarded is a good start, provided so are presumptions along the way.
Indeed, as you need to understand simple math, geometry to understand the lack of curvature. If no curvature it can't be a ball - period. As easy as this. With the new P900 cameras nothing disappears from site, hence there is no curvature matching with the published data of curvature calculators. It would mean 2 things, 1. no curvature, 2. much bigger earth but in the second case nothing could work, maps, flights, ships, etc.
Everything else and but but but how comes after this. Like how the sun and moon works, etc.
The high-powered zoom functionality of the P900 does not support flat earth as explained below:
1. Scale of curvature relative to the field of view.
The Earthβs curvature is very gentle β about 8 inches per mile squared (roughly 0.000126 radians per kilometer). If youβre standing at sea level, your horizon is only a few kilometers away, and the curvature over that distance is so slight that it looks flat to the eye and to any normal camera. A P900, even with its powerful zoom, is still only showing you a tiny βsliceβ of the Earth, so the curve is imperceptible.
2. Zoom β curvature detection.
The P900βs 83Γ zoom lets you see very distant objects (like ships or buildings tens of kilometers away) that are normally tiny specks. But zooming in doesnβt change geometry β it just magnifies what you already see. So if the horizon looks flat to the naked eye, it will also look flat on the P900. What zoom does show clearly, though, is that distant objects do disappear bottom-first behind the horizon β a geometric consequence of curvature.
3. Flatness in photos β flat Earth.
Even from an aeroplane at 10β12 km altitude, the Earth looks basically flat across your window. The curve only becomes clearly visible at altitudes of ~35,000β40,000 feet with a very wide field of view, or in photos taken from weather balloons and spacecraft.
I am sorry I have no patience for this type of conversation, you are lying. The math, the curvature and after what distance an object should disappear - but it appears again with a good cameraβ zoom is a constant, means it should be applied without fault. For people who want to know more like why and how seasons, sun, moon, etc works, I kindly suggest to visit Eric Dubayβ YouTube channel, you wonβt find a thing which was not explained and proven till details there including the distance / disappearance problem.
If you want to entertain yourself and laugh a lot on the globe stupidity, I kindly suggest to watch Spacebustersβ series on Youtube, NASA fanboys explain this, 3-4 minutes long funny videos.
Agent meant airplanes in the air, i'm pretty sure. And your declarations of ASK QUORA, ASK QUARA!!! are desperate. You need better technique, Petra, because right now you sound like the worn out bearings in a millstone. Agent wrote a brilliant piece and it would take you weeks to do enough research to debunk it, but you can't, and you won't, so you fling shit like monkeys at a zoo.
I'm still not sure about satellites but Agent's piece gave me a lot to think about, unlike you, Petra...what an asshole you are.
You obviously didn't read my answer carefully ... so who's the asshole?
He meant aeroplanes both in the air and in airports.
--- Re airports - I worked out myself that it's a case of zooming
--- Re in the air - an answer in quora shows an aeroplane in the air - zooming again is the key issue
When I say ask Quora I don't mean to imply that you should blindly accept whatever answers are provided (in some cases, of course, there are contradictory ones), I mean at least ask, at least attempt to find an answer. In fact, I didn't actually ask Quora I put the question into Google and Quora came up as it often does. Sometimes it's Reddit and sometimes it's just random sources - whatever. Of course, if I want to ask anything related to psyops I don't use Google generally, I used yandex or some other search engine. I know I shouldn't really use Google at all but ...
What I should have said was simply make an attempt to find an answer before producing masses of material that has no argument to support.
Please actually look at the specific answer in Quora and get back to me on its validity.
To fully read long comments takes time. If the first 2-3 sentences are good enough to prove that the person is either delusional or an agent of disinformation I won't bother any longer. Sorry.
Also - I can't speak for others - but for me, I am fed up with people who couldn't show proof, who couldn't understand simple math because many didn't have the time or patience to research, but this constant lying coming from "trusted voices" made possible to run a faked pandemic and inject people with poison, creating a worldwide mad house of fear.
There is just one big lesson and just after one big lie anyone can make the conclusion. If the world-wide power governments, etc who are allegedly enemies (wars here and there) can lie together as big as the globe earth, the satellites, the moon landing the viruses, then they can lie about basically anything. As long as they do it together - as happened during the pandemic hoax - the average citizen will be conned into even committing suicide with the help of a jab and out of fear. Hence your responsibility is enormous.
Present real proof and try to make it short, thank you. That was just a couple of years ago that the EU looked for trusted voices, volunteers to hire, 450 000 of them, the UK has it disinformation army called 77 brigade. What do you think, where are these people pushing misinfo and confusion? Here, too maybe?
Bro, 'Quara' is a total jewSA government psyop, like jewsuit jewgle Earth, ya got suckered, dude!! WakeyΒ² sheeple grabblers!
Try measuring the circumference of Antarctica with your Google Earth. Pleasr explain,How does that work? Your cartoon continent at the bottom of a spinning, wobbling, Waterball, globe, ya just can't connect the points, can ya? Because It's impossiball! π€π€£π
Why won't NASA let us see the only sourse codes for their GPS(GROUND POSITIONING SYSTEM), Not Global, silly)?
Believe? These things are not a matter of believes but a matter of proof. We have a firmament, we live in a closed place, the NASA tried to break this firmament, it was recorded on video (see my upper comment with link), also there were a couple of other rockets to test this. Your "satellites" hang on helium filled balloons UNDER the firmament. The firmament stretches under the ocean, too. The guy who filmed it and published it suddenly died in a helicopter explosion. He discovered the under-water firmament part while filming BluePlanet. Their submarine was kicked back by a "force" from the surface of something which looked like a river in the bottom of the ocean, they couldn't submerge into it.
"Mike deGruy killed for filming the firmament under the ocean"
No. With the help of your mobile phone (the gateway), if you are "vaccinated" with the C-vax, you are very likely "chipped" and has a dynamic unidentifiable MAC address (visible only for old Androids or Androids with Bluetooth Scanner app.). The sensors in you report about you, the information goes on the usual way with the help of your phone (or tablet probably, too). It is known by the way almost since the beginning.
I advise a video to watch, the science/reference list (what they can do) is minutes long and we checked most of it back then.
"REVIEW: The MAC phenomenon and the intra-body nano-network of communications"
In the Book of Enoch, the entire description of the earth is told. It's not an easy read though. At least for me it wasn't. Some people dismiss the missing books of the Bible. They were hidden for a reason. The truth is never hidden. We were taught that they weren't inspired, and that may be, but that doesn't make them less credible. There are witnesses of things in the past. We have witnesses in courts. Granted, people lie in court. But I am one that questions everything since we have been deceived since we were born. People think we aren't deceived by the written Word, but even that has been tampered with by man. There shouldn't be different Bibles. There shouldn't be churches of many different denominations and organizations, that teach different doctrine. This should be common sense. Everyone should be on the same page. Religion is man-made. The cause of all our problems. It causes Christians to fight amongst themselves about who is right and who is wrong. This was meant to create confusion and divide. Just like all research on other subjects, the Bible also should be researched. Man interpreted it, and penned it. Many Bibles have more books. Many Bibles have words added, changed, deleted, verses missing, even a whole chapter in a book. If you take just the KJV Bibles, they are not all the same word for word. They should be. God gave man free will, so that includes tampering with His Word. Satan has been in control.
I kinda wondered that but could be planes couldn't it? Also we always laughed how they could tell your car rego no from 'space' (supposedly by satellite) but can't tell us where the various mysteriously missing planes went down.
NASA had a plane, this info was not even hidden, it was on their website (maybe still is), it was a special plane with a very advanced camera. The plane name was Sofia or similar, a woman' name starting with S (can't recall, sorry).
I think there is no reason why their helium filled "satellite" carrier balloons couldn't do photos, they probably can.
I remember when Goog was frist creating Street View back in about...mmmm...early 2000s...they rode around in cars with a camera on top encased in an orb like thing. AND they had people walking around in the streets with cameras on poles, and wearing bright yellow jackets so they didn't run over by cars. At first I didn't know what they were doing, and only figured it out later.
I think that was their base run to document infrastructure in an intensive method. They probably still do it but I don't live in an area that I would see it.
I recall, as a youngster, watching Echo pass overhead at night. The local paper published the orbit times. As weeks went by, Echo went from spherical to lopsided, as meteroites struck it and caused to partially collapse. BTW, the photo you tagged as an A12 spyplane is of the SR71 recon aircraft.
Why use balloons for spying instead of satellites? Two photographic reasons. First, a low flying balloon can capture oblique views of earthly targets. A satellite, due to its altitude, is limited to acute views - in plain English, straight down at 90 degrees to the target. Second, the closer the camera is to the target, less distortion caused by the atmosphere is present, and proximity makes for higher resolution images. And the farther away the camera is from a moving subject, the greater the likelihood of a sharp, motion-stopping image being made. Try to photograph a racecar from just behind the trackside fence ... then shoot it from the top of the grandstand. In the first case, even a shutter speed of 1/4000 second may not prevent blur. In the latter case, 1/250 second will freeze motion. Study physics and/or master photography, and you'll be better able to separate photographic wheat from chaff.
Exceptional stuff once again Agent, I have really appreciated your recent exposes on these scientific hoaxes perpetrated against the masses. NASA is the largest purchaser of helium in the world on a yearly basis, and satelloons certainly account for a large portion of the satellites erroneously stated as being in orbit. I have my own thoughts on the shape of the Earth (https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth), but satellites donβt have to necessarily conflict with that understanding.
Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Paul LaViolette? I wrote about him a few months back: https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth. He has helped expose the weaponization of antigravity (aka electrogravitics/eletrokinetics/electric propulsion). This is the same method that many satellites are admitted to use within literature on the subject.
I guess Iβm mostly curious if you found more info on this specific angle in your research on the topic? Itβs an angle I donβt see mentioned much.
By that logic, the bulb in my lamp is round, therefore, my house must be round.
If the Earth is in a unique position, something which all emprical physical data back ups, then the sphericity of Earth in relation to the celestial bodies does not logically flow.
If there is water above, and water below us, we surely can't be a spinning ball, in space, in water. Water is always level too. This is one subject that I can't prove either way. There is too much evidence that supports both sides. I agree that some evidence is a bit shady. People actually took the tallest building here, and the tallest building across the world, put a line connecting those two buildings and it wasn't curved. It should have been. But, I don't know what they used to determine this or what software. I don't think either flat or globe earth will ever be 100% proven to be true. I believe this will remain a mystery. My question is, if people are on a ship going to the other side of the world, where a curve is shown on a globe, then why do people feel like they are going straight? Even in a plane. A plane will turn left or right, but it doesn't take a nose dive when the earth curves, nor fly sideways around it. A boat, the same thing. It's consistently floating straight. Not sideways or moving over a curve and heading down like on a roller coaster. To confuse things more, there are articles about how gravity and space do not exist.
The NASA's rocket had nothing to do with the book of Enoch when tried to break the firmament (and failed, recorded with their logo in the corner), nor Hillary C when emphasizing how many cracks the firmament (glass ceiling in her words) had. Nor the Simpsons mocking on us while openly telling there is a firmament.
All of the NASA documents, rocket science documents, Russian documents and similar when the shape of the earth mattered for tech calculations wrote about a "stationary non rotating earth")
Because of it it is not gravity but density. Otherwise true. Levitating object can levitate with the help of electrical or magnetic charge. Same charges repel each other.
You've just proven flat earth. :) Water is always level. To my husband (a space ship type movies lover) it took half a year to accept flat earth as he just couldn't digest that he was so seriously conned and his favourite PC games and series are all fully tales.
For me, after the virus hoax and wireless radiation-pandemic, it was much easier, before that big lie I had never given a thought of the ball-earth. I knew that moon landing must have been a hoax (knowing the tech level back then, a computer was a size of a room), I saw that the moon at early mornings look transparent(ish) but never gave a second thought. When I did - thank you wikipedia! for that little blue banner on flat earth videos - I knew that something was very wrong and despite of the constant ridiculing (of flat earth believers) I went into that r.hole. The debate ended with the math of the curvature and object being visible again with a good camera despite of the alleged curvature. I was rather just upset that I was so dumb and silly to believe it and not seeing the visible. Like the old joke in the movie, man in the bed with 2 women, wife arrives, man says from the bed: I didn't cheat on you, you believe your eyes but me?! (Chicago I think and Lucy Liu was the wife.)
But that only keeps you in the boat then. It still doesn't make sense if we actually go around a curve. North you would be going over like a roller coaster. East or West, you would be sideways. If gravity keeps you in the boat, you would still feel like a roller coaster going sideways. On a roller coaster you feel the tilt. This is just my opinion. Like I said it's all questionable either way. We can't even say a circle means a globe. A circular shape can be flat. Like a circle drawn on pavement. Antarctica holds the key to our mystery, I believe. I also believe in lands beyond the ice wall. The UN has a flat earth map hanging inside. A series of videos done by Nos Confunden, is real interesting. The maps are shown.
The moon is not round (I guess you wanted to write "ball shaped" as round can mean flat round shape). Very easy to prove. Grab a torch-light and direct it to a ball, the ball will reflect the light on a spot but on the whole ball (considering size). But the moon' light is all over there, it can't be a reflection and the moon can't be ball shaped. The moon is a plasma and the sun very likely also, they are appx the similar sized and very close to each other (height), the sun is a bit above.
The sun allegedly has positive charge, the moon has negative charge, when the moon is not full the stronger charge (sun) nullifies a part of the charge of the moon. (Vibes of Cosmos - Youtube - Freemasonic knowledge so accept it with a pint of salt, probably half truth half diversion)
I also agree that there are no satellites outside .. but we do absolutely have LEOs .. the low earth orbit ones are using balloons & small military fusion cells to power them ..
all the world π really is a stage
& the actors discs fantastic job of keeping us in the dark
everything!We were told is fake from dinosaurs to space exploration to the moon landings
Our biological clocks are ticking faster than ever now as we are infected with this new depopulating nano and soon most of us will be swept away when our bodyβs reach full saturation β¦
so we may not have the time enough left to find out the truth about our planet earth
Enjoy the ride is all we can do now & smile & letβs see what journey as souls we will next incarnate into ..
I was having a good laugh ( always appreciated today) - I do like your ability to see outside the normy box. No planes, even at the busiest airports on the blue balls, let alone flying? WTAF.
What about Antarctica that's being guarded to not allow anyone through the mountain to another dimension maybe.? Thinking of flat earth here. Does anyone know the stiry?
What is really interesting that a couple of things happened on a tight time-line. Admiral Byrd came back from one of his Antarctica Exploration and gave a TV interview (still on Youtube) telling that he found further land beyond the ice wall, as big as the US and full with resources. Then he died within a 2 year, the NASA was established, the Antarctica treaty also and they "went to the moon" (great diversion) plus the UFO legends started. Also around that time they started to test the firmament. How to break it. Failed. You can read after these if you are interested, very telling names like Operation FISHBOWL within Operation DOMINIC (Fishbowl of the Lord). The whole NASA stuff -apart from basically stealing a nice amount of tax money - was for diversion from Antarctica and what they had found there. I don't think it was only the firmament (if that ends there). I think that can be and very likely are other type of living forms beyond the wall. Research Vibes of Cosmos 'channel (Youtube) with a pinch of salt, their moon-map and their assumed cycle of when we are entering into a major ice-age while other areas melt "out" and become liveable. If this is the case, it is very likely that these events of harsh climate change trigger people and animal to change their locations if there is way through the ice. Can be.
LOVE your work Agent!!!!
"Satellites" are held up by helium-filled balloons... NASA is the #1 purchaser of helium!
Helium is an inert gas used to condense oxygen and hydrogen to make rocket fuel.
There's lots of footage of Nasa sending up helium balloons with satellites attached to them. Look for it.
In 1988/9 I worked for Dr Elisabeth Muller, the inventor of Inmarsat (International Maritime Satellite). I was her speech-writer and PA. We were selling the information gathered from every Lloyds Agent located at all airports and shipping ports worldwide. Our customers were governments and Agencies like the CIA. We communicated via an early form of email as she jetted around the world selling the system. Obviously, being based in an office in the City of London, I never actually saw the satellite which relayed all the communications between Lloyds Agents and our communications hub in London. It never crossed my mind to doubt the existence of the thing. Nowadays there are several Inmarsat satellites operating in orbit and they provide the world's government (plus the exceedingly wealthy) with an alternative and exclusive, very expensive internet. They are proud to provide telecoms and internet to superyachts and private aircraft. They are also advertising that they are taking part in the Internet of Things. There is some skulduggery going on, it is unclear who owns what now..... some takeovers and name changes having occurred.
Anyway, for your future investigations, here is a link to explore: https://www.inmarsat.com/en/index.html
Can you imagine an other way to set up a system of internetlike communicatons that's not involving satellites?
Btw, is it true, that in the City of London UK-Law does not apply?
The City of London (one square mile) is an independent state within the UK. So is the Vatican and Washington DC. These are the three lairs of the Black Nobility. They each have their own laws, police force and are not answerable to the countries they exist within.
https://open.substack.com/pub/francesleader/p/the-black-nobility-podcast
EDIT:
24th June 2024 - THE INTERVIEW IN FULL IS NOW AVAILABLE ON ODYSEE!
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/150424_24p:6
fascinating!.. I just took in the 1st 20 minutes and have learned volumes of,. of things that we clearly see going on in the world.. Rome running spirituality (with their baal worshippers in control); London running finance (Making perfect sense - the queen was said to have been worth trillions..) and WDC running the military; Look at Trump.. he no sooner got into office than he began accusing Iran of terrorist acts (the pot always calling the kettle black).. and promised to uptick trade with Turkey from $20,000,000 to $100,000,000 by selling them WEAPONS systems.. (notably with IRAN the only middle eastern nation left standing that is also on General Wesley Clark's expose list of nations we mean to 'take down'.)
It is also perfectly clear from the last several years, that eugenics is on the top burner, seeing as wars may be fought now without boots on the ground (as we have seen in Gaza and Syria), and by emptying countries.. killing off their populations,.. as we have in Iraq, Ukraine, Russia, Syria, Lebanon, and African nations, they can steal all the natural resources, oil, and wealth of the nations.
Does anyone suppose the Church will ever pay attention to the writing on the wall? In Army Intelligence we had an expression that we were the 'FIRST to know, but the 'last to GO'.. Where as the Marine Corps was the 'Last to know, but the First to go'..
I would have to say that the Church is the last to know.. Which makes the black nobility's job of killing the masses, that much easier.
When you say 'the Church' do you mean the parishioners? The fact is that the Cardinals and Popes of the Roman Catholic Church have always been 'in the know' behind closed doors. Most of them, over history, have been from Black Nobility families and fully aware of the totalitarian nature of their organisation which is merely the mind control division of the clandestine Roman Empire!
https://boodicca.substack.com/p/exposing-roman-empire-20
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
No. I mean the Church of God in Christ Jesus that began with Pentecost 2000 years ago, which is a ghost of its 1st Century self.. That one.
Ah, those are the real Christians that the Roman Empire continues to persecute.
Very interesting, thank you :-)
Your reporting is the best spy satellite exposing the Freemason US Government lying to the world over the past 80 years. I wonder what payload is actually being thrust into space on a regular basis by NASA and Space X if the βhigh-tech satellitesβ America is manufacturing only require a balloon to launch them into space. π€
There is no space, but there is a firmament.
Proven. By the way, the 7th rocket hitting the dome was NASA's rocket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rmDj1MJyaY
What they call to be satellites are helium balloons, I don't know what they can or can't do.
I'm afraid, Agent, you're little guilty of elephant hurling - a logical fallacy I came across on Mike Stone's most recent post (https://mikestone.substack.com/p/a-senseless-strand).
https://creationwiki.org/Fallacy_of_elephant_hurling
You push out masses of evidence to support your argument without doing due diligence to check your hypothesis is correct. Why not ask around a bit first. Quora is one place you can go.
You simply need to zoom in to see planes in airports, the same for cars. This is Sydney airport zoomed in on Google maps. (When you zoom out you can't see the planes nor the cars.)
https://www.google.com/maps/@-33.9322806,151.1793264,455m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu
The following question has been asked and answered in Quora:
When watching videos or pictures of the Earth from satellites in low orbit, why can't we see airplanes flying at a high altitude? We see clouds and land masses plainly, right?
The second response provides three satellite images of the same location at different levels of zoom. You can actually see a plane but only when the image is zoomed in more.
https://www.quora.com/When-watching-videos-or-pictures-of-the-Earth-from-satellites-in-low-orbit-why-cant-we-see-airplanes-flying-at-a-high-altitude-We-see-clouds-and-land-masses-plainly-right
Like you, my sister doesn't believe in satellites and her "method" reminds me of yours. She decides what's what on a limited amount of information. Aim to prove your hypothesis wrong as best you can first before gathering mountains of evidence to support your case.
Elephant hurling, genetic fallacy, special pleading, personal incredulity and others. Discarding assumptions when conducting investigatons goes both ways. If at any point in the timeline a false conclusion propells things forward then it's a search for more selective evidence with inbuilt conclusions. That withstanding I respect all truthers and skeptics for having the courage to question anything and everything.
Truthers have everything against them at the outset. We really do need to do our utmost not to become "useful idiots" by ensuring anything we call fake really is and I don't think Agent puts enough effort in that direction.
I highly respect all curious people and Agent has done solid work, and made me question some things so I won't be guilty of genetic fallacy myself. It's difficult to know the truth of many topics or even begin to investigate, but those who undertake the journey have my respect. The assumptions being discarded is a good start, provided so are presumptions along the way.
Likewise the moon landings.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/moon-landings-hoax-psyop
Indeed, as you need to understand simple math, geometry to understand the lack of curvature. If no curvature it can't be a ball - period. As easy as this. With the new P900 cameras nothing disappears from site, hence there is no curvature matching with the published data of curvature calculators. It would mean 2 things, 1. no curvature, 2. much bigger earth but in the second case nothing could work, maps, flights, ships, etc.
Everything else and but but but how comes after this. Like how the sun and moon works, etc.
The high-powered zoom functionality of the P900 does not support flat earth as explained below:
1. Scale of curvature relative to the field of view.
The Earthβs curvature is very gentle β about 8 inches per mile squared (roughly 0.000126 radians per kilometer). If youβre standing at sea level, your horizon is only a few kilometers away, and the curvature over that distance is so slight that it looks flat to the eye and to any normal camera. A P900, even with its powerful zoom, is still only showing you a tiny βsliceβ of the Earth, so the curve is imperceptible.
2. Zoom β curvature detection.
The P900βs 83Γ zoom lets you see very distant objects (like ships or buildings tens of kilometers away) that are normally tiny specks. But zooming in doesnβt change geometry β it just magnifies what you already see. So if the horizon looks flat to the naked eye, it will also look flat on the P900. What zoom does show clearly, though, is that distant objects do disappear bottom-first behind the horizon β a geometric consequence of curvature.
3. Flatness in photos β flat Earth.
Even from an aeroplane at 10β12 km altitude, the Earth looks basically flat across your window. The curve only becomes clearly visible at altitudes of ~35,000β40,000 feet with a very wide field of view, or in photos taken from weather balloons and spacecraft.
I am sorry I have no patience for this type of conversation, you are lying. The math, the curvature and after what distance an object should disappear - but it appears again with a good cameraβ zoom is a constant, means it should be applied without fault. For people who want to know more like why and how seasons, sun, moon, etc works, I kindly suggest to visit Eric Dubayβ YouTube channel, you wonβt find a thing which was not explained and proven till details there including the distance / disappearance problem.
If you want to entertain yourself and laugh a lot on the globe stupidity, I kindly suggest to watch Spacebustersβ series on Youtube, NASA fanboys explain this, 3-4 minutes long funny videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9u6FMK8UZI&list=PLMYB1WEMkYL1w1ooMcaOpI61TPNftEdYW
Agent meant airplanes in the air, i'm pretty sure. And your declarations of ASK QUORA, ASK QUARA!!! are desperate. You need better technique, Petra, because right now you sound like the worn out bearings in a millstone. Agent wrote a brilliant piece and it would take you weeks to do enough research to debunk it, but you can't, and you won't, so you fling shit like monkeys at a zoo.
I'm still not sure about satellites but Agent's piece gave me a lot to think about, unlike you, Petra...what an asshole you are.
You obviously didn't read my answer carefully ... so who's the asshole?
He meant aeroplanes both in the air and in airports.
--- Re airports - I worked out myself that it's a case of zooming
--- Re in the air - an answer in quora shows an aeroplane in the air - zooming again is the key issue
When I say ask Quora I don't mean to imply that you should blindly accept whatever answers are provided (in some cases, of course, there are contradictory ones), I mean at least ask, at least attempt to find an answer. In fact, I didn't actually ask Quora I put the question into Google and Quora came up as it often does. Sometimes it's Reddit and sometimes it's just random sources - whatever. Of course, if I want to ask anything related to psyops I don't use Google generally, I used yandex or some other search engine. I know I shouldn't really use Google at all but ...
What I should have said was simply make an attempt to find an answer before producing masses of material that has no argument to support.
Please actually look at the specific answer in Quora and get back to me on its validity.
https://www.quora.com/When-watching-videos-or-pictures-of-the-Earth-from-satellites-in-low-orbit-why-cant-we-see-airplanes-flying-at-a-high-altitude-We-see-clouds-and-land-masses-plainly-right
Just use Snope.com, dude, of course they wouldn't lie either, now would they
To fully read long comments takes time. If the first 2-3 sentences are good enough to prove that the person is either delusional or an agent of disinformation I won't bother any longer. Sorry.
Also - I can't speak for others - but for me, I am fed up with people who couldn't show proof, who couldn't understand simple math because many didn't have the time or patience to research, but this constant lying coming from "trusted voices" made possible to run a faked pandemic and inject people with poison, creating a worldwide mad house of fear.
There is just one big lesson and just after one big lie anyone can make the conclusion. If the world-wide power governments, etc who are allegedly enemies (wars here and there) can lie together as big as the globe earth, the satellites, the moon landing the viruses, then they can lie about basically anything. As long as they do it together - as happened during the pandemic hoax - the average citizen will be conned into even committing suicide with the help of a jab and out of fear. Hence your responsibility is enormous.
Present real proof and try to make it short, thank you. That was just a couple of years ago that the EU looked for trusted voices, volunteers to hire, 450 000 of them, the UK has it disinformation army called 77 brigade. What do you think, where are these people pushing misinfo and confusion? Here, too maybe?
Ok I will try that.
Righteous, Indignation, bro.
He's just lost in their jew sauce! π€£π€π
Bro, 'Quara' is a total jewSA government psyop, like jewsuit jewgle Earth, ya got suckered, dude!! WakeyΒ² sheeple grabblers!
Try measuring the circumference of Antarctica with your Google Earth. Pleasr explain,How does that work? Your cartoon continent at the bottom of a spinning, wobbling, Waterball, globe, ya just can't connect the points, can ya? Because It's impossiball! π€π€£π
Why won't NASA let us see the only sourse codes for their GPS(GROUND POSITIONING SYSTEM), Not Global, silly)?
Believe? These things are not a matter of believes but a matter of proof. We have a firmament, we live in a closed place, the NASA tried to break this firmament, it was recorded on video (see my upper comment with link), also there were a couple of other rockets to test this. Your "satellites" hang on helium filled balloons UNDER the firmament. The firmament stretches under the ocean, too. The guy who filmed it and published it suddenly died in a helicopter explosion. He discovered the under-water firmament part while filming BluePlanet. Their submarine was kicked back by a "force" from the surface of something which looked like a river in the bottom of the ocean, they couldn't submerge into it.
"Mike deGruy killed for filming the firmament under the ocean"
The firmament in the ocean:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP7y1hjiA50
No. With the help of your mobile phone (the gateway), if you are "vaccinated" with the C-vax, you are very likely "chipped" and has a dynamic unidentifiable MAC address (visible only for old Androids or Androids with Bluetooth Scanner app.). The sensors in you report about you, the information goes on the usual way with the help of your phone (or tablet probably, too). It is known by the way almost since the beginning.
I advise a video to watch, the science/reference list (what they can do) is minutes long and we checked most of it back then.
"REVIEW: The MAC phenomenon and the intra-body nano-network of communications"
https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4
In the Book of Enoch, the entire description of the earth is told. It's not an easy read though. At least for me it wasn't. Some people dismiss the missing books of the Bible. They were hidden for a reason. The truth is never hidden. We were taught that they weren't inspired, and that may be, but that doesn't make them less credible. There are witnesses of things in the past. We have witnesses in courts. Granted, people lie in court. But I am one that questions everything since we have been deceived since we were born. People think we aren't deceived by the written Word, but even that has been tampered with by man. There shouldn't be different Bibles. There shouldn't be churches of many different denominations and organizations, that teach different doctrine. This should be common sense. Everyone should be on the same page. Religion is man-made. The cause of all our problems. It causes Christians to fight amongst themselves about who is right and who is wrong. This was meant to create confusion and divide. Just like all research on other subjects, the Bible also should be researched. Man interpreted it, and penned it. Many Bibles have more books. Many Bibles have words added, changed, deleted, verses missing, even a whole chapter in a book. If you take just the KJV Bibles, they are not all the same word for word. They should be. God gave man free will, so that includes tampering with His Word. Satan has been in control.
If satellites are fake, what about deep-space probes? Where is Voyager now, in reality? In a hangar in Nevada??
In the mind of a NASA graphic artist.
Iβm just wondering whatβs been taking pictures of my house with my vehicles sitting in my yard? I can actually go look it up on Google earth.
I kinda wondered that but could be planes couldn't it? Also we always laughed how they could tell your car rego no from 'space' (supposedly by satellite) but can't tell us where the various mysteriously missing planes went down.
True!
NASA had a plane, this info was not even hidden, it was on their website (maybe still is), it was a special plane with a very advanced camera. The plane name was Sofia or similar, a woman' name starting with S (can't recall, sorry).
I think there is no reason why their helium filled "satellite" carrier balloons couldn't do photos, they probably can.
Jewgle Earth, goy!
I remember when Goog was frist creating Street View back in about...mmmm...early 2000s...they rode around in cars with a camera on top encased in an orb like thing. AND they had people walking around in the streets with cameras on poles, and wearing bright yellow jackets so they didn't run over by cars. At first I didn't know what they were doing, and only figured it out later.
I think that was their base run to document infrastructure in an intensive method. They probably still do it but I don't live in an area that I would see it.
I recall, as a youngster, watching Echo pass overhead at night. The local paper published the orbit times. As weeks went by, Echo went from spherical to lopsided, as meteroites struck it and caused to partially collapse. BTW, the photo you tagged as an A12 spyplane is of the SR71 recon aircraft.
Why use balloons for spying instead of satellites? Two photographic reasons. First, a low flying balloon can capture oblique views of earthly targets. A satellite, due to its altitude, is limited to acute views - in plain English, straight down at 90 degrees to the target. Second, the closer the camera is to the target, less distortion caused by the atmosphere is present, and proximity makes for higher resolution images. And the farther away the camera is from a moving subject, the greater the likelihood of a sharp, motion-stopping image being made. Try to photograph a racecar from just behind the trackside fence ... then shoot it from the top of the grandstand. In the first case, even a shutter speed of 1/4000 second may not prevent blur. In the latter case, 1/250 second will freeze motion. Study physics and/or master photography, and you'll be better able to separate photographic wheat from chaff.
You spy you. But a little all over the place with this one, but revealing. Hereβs some more food for thought.
Whoβs one of the largest producers of helium?
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/helium-reserves-country-biggest-helium-031157836.html
What happens when helium production is low?
Chinese satellites held by balloons, really large ones, start falling out of the sky.
Never seen the videos of how they actually launch satellites? Theyβre out there.
https://www.youtube.com/live/oM5fKcU5ClI?feature=shared
Thereβs no space, not what they teach in schools. The only space is the one between scientistβs ears and those who believe their crap.
The world we live in is a gargantuan SCAM.
Just wonder how many believe the International Space Station is really up there ππΌ?
You wouldnβt believe how important and valuable helium is to them. It helps them with their satellite scam.
https://www.madehow.com/Volume-4/Helium.html
Nothing can penetrate Godβs firmament, that man can come up with anyway.
Exceptional stuff once again Agent, I have really appreciated your recent exposes on these scientific hoaxes perpetrated against the masses. NASA is the largest purchaser of helium in the world on a yearly basis, and satelloons certainly account for a large portion of the satellites erroneously stated as being in orbit. I have my own thoughts on the shape of the Earth (https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth), but satellites donβt have to necessarily conflict with that understanding.
Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Paul LaViolette? I wrote about him a few months back: https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth. He has helped expose the weaponization of antigravity (aka electrogravitics/eletrokinetics/electric propulsion). This is the same method that many satellites are admitted to use within literature on the subject.
I guess Iβm mostly curious if you found more info on this specific angle in your research on the topic? Itβs an angle I donβt see mentioned much.
The sun and moon are visible to our eyes and are round! Why would the Earth be flat?
By that logic, the bulb in my lamp is round, therefore, my house must be round.
If the Earth is in a unique position, something which all emprical physical data back ups, then the sphericity of Earth in relation to the celestial bodies does not logically flow.
Fisheye lenses are round.
If there is water above, and water below us, we surely can't be a spinning ball, in space, in water. Water is always level too. This is one subject that I can't prove either way. There is too much evidence that supports both sides. I agree that some evidence is a bit shady. People actually took the tallest building here, and the tallest building across the world, put a line connecting those two buildings and it wasn't curved. It should have been. But, I don't know what they used to determine this or what software. I don't think either flat or globe earth will ever be 100% proven to be true. I believe this will remain a mystery. My question is, if people are on a ship going to the other side of the world, where a curve is shown on a globe, then why do people feel like they are going straight? Even in a plane. A plane will turn left or right, but it doesn't take a nose dive when the earth curves, nor fly sideways around it. A boat, the same thing. It's consistently floating straight. Not sideways or moving over a curve and heading down like on a roller coaster. To confuse things more, there are articles about how gravity and space do not exist.
Everyone should read the book of Enoch.
I agree!
The NASA's rocket had nothing to do with the book of Enoch when tried to break the firmament (and failed, recorded with their logo in the corner), nor Hillary C when emphasizing how many cracks the firmament (glass ceiling in her words) had. Nor the Simpsons mocking on us while openly telling there is a firmament.
All of the NASA documents, rocket science documents, Russian documents and similar when the shape of the earth mattered for tech calculations wrote about a "stationary non rotating earth")
Imagine that, the world still possess those who are illiterate.
Mommy and Duddy couldnβt buy you an edutation, huh!
Gravity is real, however, itβs an electrical phenomenon as opposed to the nonsensical bending of an abstract concept, such as time.
https://dfreality.substack.com/p/the-alien-agenda-part-i
Because of it it is not gravity but density. Otherwise true. Levitating object can levitate with the help of electrical or magnetic charge. Same charges repel each other.
You've just proven flat earth. :) Water is always level. To my husband (a space ship type movies lover) it took half a year to accept flat earth as he just couldn't digest that he was so seriously conned and his favourite PC games and series are all fully tales.
For me, after the virus hoax and wireless radiation-pandemic, it was much easier, before that big lie I had never given a thought of the ball-earth. I knew that moon landing must have been a hoax (knowing the tech level back then, a computer was a size of a room), I saw that the moon at early mornings look transparent(ish) but never gave a second thought. When I did - thank you wikipedia! for that little blue banner on flat earth videos - I knew that something was very wrong and despite of the constant ridiculing (of flat earth believers) I went into that r.hole. The debate ended with the math of the curvature and object being visible again with a good camera despite of the alleged curvature. I was rather just upset that I was so dumb and silly to believe it and not seeing the visible. Like the old joke in the movie, man in the bed with 2 women, wife arrives, man says from the bed: I didn't cheat on you, you believe your eyes but me?! (Chicago I think and Lucy Liu was the wife.)
Gravity!
But that only keeps you in the boat then. It still doesn't make sense if we actually go around a curve. North you would be going over like a roller coaster. East or West, you would be sideways. If gravity keeps you in the boat, you would still feel like a roller coaster going sideways. On a roller coaster you feel the tilt. This is just my opinion. Like I said it's all questionable either way. We can't even say a circle means a globe. A circular shape can be flat. Like a circle drawn on pavement. Antarctica holds the key to our mystery, I believe. I also believe in lands beyond the ice wall. The UN has a flat earth map hanging inside. A series of videos done by Nos Confunden, is real interesting. The maps are shown.
The moon is not round (I guess you wanted to write "ball shaped" as round can mean flat round shape). Very easy to prove. Grab a torch-light and direct it to a ball, the ball will reflect the light on a spot but on the whole ball (considering size). But the moon' light is all over there, it can't be a reflection and the moon can't be ball shaped. The moon is a plasma and the sun very likely also, they are appx the similar sized and very close to each other (height), the sun is a bit above.
The sun allegedly has positive charge, the moon has negative charge, when the moon is not full the stronger charge (sun) nullifies a part of the charge of the moon. (Vibes of Cosmos - Youtube - Freemasonic knowledge so accept it with a pint of salt, probably half truth half diversion)
Of course, the following photos can be from a weather balloon or simply faked (anything can be faked by now: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-are-you-427).
Airports, allegedly photographed from satellites with plenty of planes on the ground:
https://geoawesomeness.com/worlds-busiest-15-airports-from-satellite-images/
When I search for "photos of satellites taken from Earth", just about all the images are from above, and here is an exception:
https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
Super sleuth π΅οΈββοΈ you are sir !
Great reading & very factual & logical ..
I also agree that there are no satellites outside .. but we do absolutely have LEOs .. the low earth orbit ones are using balloons & small military fusion cells to power them ..
all the world π really is a stage
& the actors discs fantastic job of keeping us in the dark
everything!We were told is fake from dinosaurs to space exploration to the moon landings
Our biological clocks are ticking faster than ever now as we are infected with this new depopulating nano and soon most of us will be swept away when our bodyβs reach full saturation β¦
so we may not have the time enough left to find out the truth about our planet earth
Enjoy the ride is all we can do now & smile & letβs see what journey as souls we will next incarnate into ..
This earth time line for me has been a fun one .
You are a FOOL SIR
dinosaur bones are fake !
Space exploration is fake nothing gets past the firmament!
The moon is not solid !
You are honestly the most uninformed individual on these posts .. i can clearly see you researched nothing outside of what msm tell you..
its true what they say
You simply cannot fix stupid !π
I was having a good laugh ( always appreciated today) - I do like your ability to see outside the normy box. No planes, even at the busiest airports on the blue balls, let alone flying? WTAF.
What about Antarctica that's being guarded to not allow anyone through the mountain to another dimension maybe.? Thinking of flat earth here. Does anyone know the stiry?
What is really interesting that a couple of things happened on a tight time-line. Admiral Byrd came back from one of his Antarctica Exploration and gave a TV interview (still on Youtube) telling that he found further land beyond the ice wall, as big as the US and full with resources. Then he died within a 2 year, the NASA was established, the Antarctica treaty also and they "went to the moon" (great diversion) plus the UFO legends started. Also around that time they started to test the firmament. How to break it. Failed. You can read after these if you are interested, very telling names like Operation FISHBOWL within Operation DOMINIC (Fishbowl of the Lord). The whole NASA stuff -apart from basically stealing a nice amount of tax money - was for diversion from Antarctica and what they had found there. I don't think it was only the firmament (if that ends there). I think that can be and very likely are other type of living forms beyond the wall. Research Vibes of Cosmos 'channel (Youtube) with a pinch of salt, their moon-map and their assumed cycle of when we are entering into a major ice-age while other areas melt "out" and become liveable. If this is the case, it is very likely that these events of harsh climate change trigger people and animal to change their locations if there is way through the ice. Can be.