A true story of how NASA, the CIA and Santa Claus pulled off the unthinkable. (Yes, Santa Claus, because when it comes to the government, the truth really is stranger than fiction...)
In 1988/9 I worked for Dr Elisabeth Muller, the inventor of Inmarsat (International Maritime Satellite). I was her speech-writer and PA. We were selling the information gathered from every Lloyds Agent located at all airports and shipping ports worldwide. Our customers were governments and Agencies like the CIA. We communicated via an early form of email as she jetted around the world selling the system. Obviously, being based in an office in the City of London, I never actually saw the satellite which relayed all the communications between Lloyds Agents and our communications hub in London. It never crossed my mind to doubt the existence of the thing. Nowadays there are several Inmarsat satellites operating in orbit and they provide the world's government (plus the exceedingly wealthy) with an alternative and exclusive, very expensive internet. They are proud to provide telecoms and internet to superyachts and private aircraft. They are also advertising that they are taking part in the Internet of Things. There is some skulduggery going on, it is unclear who owns what now..... some takeovers and name changes having occurred.
The City of London (one square mile) is an independent state within the UK. So is the Vatican and Washington DC. These are the three lairs of the Black Nobility. They each have their own laws, police force and are not answerable to the countries they exist within.
Your reporting is the best spy satellite exposing the Freemason US Government lying to the world over the past 80 years. I wonder what payload is actually being thrust into space on a regular basis by NASA and Space X if the “high-tech satellites” America is manufacturing only require a balloon to launch them into space. 🤔
You push out masses of evidence to support your argument without doing due diligence to check your hypothesis is correct. Why not ask around a bit first. Quora is one place you can go.
You simply need to zoom in to see planes in airports, the same for cars. This is Sydney airport zoomed in on Google maps. (When you zoom out you can't see the planes nor the cars.)
The following question has been asked and answered in Quora:
When watching videos or pictures of the Earth from satellites in low orbit, why can't we see airplanes flying at a high altitude? We see clouds and land masses plainly, right?
The second response provides three satellite images of the same location at different levels of zoom. You can actually see a plane but only when the image is zoomed in more.
Like you, my sister doesn't believe in satellites and her "method" reminds me of yours. She decides what's what on a limited amount of information. Aim to prove your hypothesis wrong as best you can first before gathering mountains of evidence to support your case.
Elephant hurling, genetic fallacy, special pleading, personal incredulity and others. Discarding assumptions when conducting investigatons goes both ways. If at any point in the timeline a false conclusion propells things forward then it's a search for more selective evidence with inbuilt conclusions. That withstanding I respect all truthers and skeptics for having the courage to question anything and everything.
Truthers have everything against them at the outset. We really do need to do our utmost not to become "useful idiots" by ensuring anything we call fake really is and I don't think Agent puts enough effort in that direction.
I highly respect all curious people and Agent has done solid work, and made me question some things so I won't be guilty of genetic fallacy myself. It's difficult to know the truth of many topics or even begin to investigate, but those who undertake the journey have my respect. The assumptions being discarded is a good start, provided so are presumptions along the way.
Agent meant airplanes in the air, i'm pretty sure. And your declarations of ASK QUORA, ASK QUARA!!! are desperate. You need better technique, Petra, because right now you sound like the worn out bearings in a millstone. Agent wrote a brilliant piece and it would take you weeks to do enough research to debunk it, but you can't, and you won't, so you fling shit like monkeys at a zoo.
I'm still not sure about satellites but Agent's piece gave me a lot to think about, unlike you, Petra...what an asshole you are.
You obviously didn't read my answer carefully ... so who's the asshole?
He meant aeroplanes both in the air and in airports.
--- Re airports - I worked out myself that it's a case of zooming
--- Re in the air - an answer in quora shows an aeroplane in the air - zooming again is the key issue
When I say ask Quora I don't mean to imply that you should blindly accept whatever answers are provided (in some cases, of course, there are contradictory ones), I mean at least ask, at least attempt to find an answer. In fact, I didn't actually ask Quora I put the question into Google and Quora came up as it often does. Sometimes it's Reddit and sometimes it's just random sources - whatever. Of course, if I want to ask anything related to psyops I don't use Google generally, I used yandex or some other search engine. I know I shouldn't really use Google at all but ...
What I should have said was simply make an attempt to find an answer before producing masses of material that has no argument to support.
Please actually look at the specific answer in Quora and get back to me on its validity.
Bro, 'Quara' is a total jewSA government psyop, like jewsuit jewgle Earth, ya got suckered, dude!! Wakey² sheeple grabblers!
Try measuring the circumference of Antarctica with your Google Earth. Pleasr explain,How does that work? Your cartoon continent at the bottom of a spinning, wobbling, Waterball, globe, ya just can't connect the points, can ya? Because It's impossiball! 🤔🤣😎
Why won't NASA let us see the only sourse codes for their GPS(GROUND POSITIONING SYSTEM), Not Global, silly)?
In the Book of Enoch, the entire description of the earth is told. It's not an easy read though. At least for me it wasn't. Some people dismiss the missing books of the Bible. They were hidden for a reason. The truth is never hidden. We were taught that they weren't inspired, and that may be, but that doesn't make them less credible. There are witnesses of things in the past. We have witnesses in courts. Granted, people lie in court. But I am one that questions everything since we have been deceived since we were born. People think we aren't deceived by the written Word, but even that has been tampered with by man. There shouldn't be different Bibles. There shouldn't be churches of many different denominations and organizations, that teach different doctrine. This should be common sense. Everyone should be on the same page. Religion is man-made. The cause of all our problems. It causes Christians to fight amongst themselves about who is right and who is wrong. This was meant to create confusion and divide. Just like all research on other subjects, the Bible also should be researched. Man interpreted it, and penned it. Many Bibles have more books. Many Bibles have words added, changed, deleted, verses missing, even a whole chapter in a book. If you take just the KJV Bibles, they are not all the same word for word. They should be. God gave man free will, so that includes tampering with His Word. Satan has been in control.
I kinda wondered that but could be planes couldn't it? Also we always laughed how they could tell your car rego no from 'space' (supposedly by satellite) but can't tell us where the various mysteriously missing planes went down.
I remember when Goog was frist creating Street View back in about...mmmm...early 2000s...they rode around in cars with a camera on top encased in an orb like thing. AND they had people walking around in the streets with cameras on poles, and wearing bright yellow jackets so they didn't run over by cars. At first I didn't know what they were doing, and only figured it out later.
I think that was their base run to document infrastructure in an intensive method. They probably still do it but I don't live in an area that I would see it.
I recall, as a youngster, watching Echo pass overhead at night. The local paper published the orbit times. As weeks went by, Echo went from spherical to lopsided, as meteroites struck it and caused to partially collapse. BTW, the photo you tagged as an A12 spyplane is of the SR71 recon aircraft.
Why use balloons for spying instead of satellites? Two photographic reasons. First, a low flying balloon can capture oblique views of earthly targets. A satellite, due to its altitude, is limited to acute views - in plain English, straight down at 90 degrees to the target. Second, the closer the camera is to the target, less distortion caused by the atmosphere is present, and proximity makes for higher resolution images. And the farther away the camera is from a moving subject, the greater the likelihood of a sharp, motion-stopping image being made. Try to photograph a racecar from just behind the trackside fence ... then shoot it from the top of the grandstand. In the first case, even a shutter speed of 1/4000 second may not prevent blur. In the latter case, 1/250 second will freeze motion. Study physics and/or master photography, and you'll be better able to separate photographic wheat from chaff.
Exceptional stuff once again Agent, I have really appreciated your recent exposes on these scientific hoaxes perpetrated against the masses. NASA is the largest purchaser of helium in the world on a yearly basis, and satelloons certainly account for a large portion of the satellites erroneously stated as being in orbit. I have my own thoughts on the shape of the Earth (https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth), but satellites don’t have to necessarily conflict with that understanding.
Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Paul LaViolette? I wrote about him a few months back: https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth. He has helped expose the weaponization of antigravity (aka electrogravitics/eletrokinetics/electric propulsion). This is the same method that many satellites are admitted to use within literature on the subject.
I guess I’m mostly curious if you found more info on this specific angle in your research on the topic? It’s an angle I don’t see mentioned much.
By that logic, the bulb in my lamp is round, therefore, my house must be round.
If the Earth is in a unique position, something which all emprical physical data back ups, then the sphericity of Earth in relation to the celestial bodies does not logically flow.
If there is water above, and water below us, we surely can't be a spinning ball, in space, in water. Water is always level too. This is one subject that I can't prove either way. There is too much evidence that supports both sides. I agree that some evidence is a bit shady. People actually took the tallest building here, and the tallest building across the world, put a line connecting those two buildings and it wasn't curved. It should have been. But, I don't know what they used to determine this or what software. I don't think either flat or globe earth will ever be 100% proven to be true. I believe this will remain a mystery. My question is, if people are on a ship going to the other side of the world, where a curve is shown on a globe, then why do people feel like they are going straight? Even in a plane. A plane will turn left or right, but it doesn't take a nose dive when the earth curves, nor fly sideways around it. A boat, the same thing. It's consistently floating straight. Not sideways or moving over a curve and heading down like on a roller coaster. To confuse things more, there are articles about how gravity and space do not exist.
But that only keeps you in the boat then. It still doesn't make sense if we actually go around a curve. North you would be going over like a roller coaster. East or West, you would be sideways. If gravity keeps you in the boat, you would still feel like a roller coaster going sideways. On a roller coaster you feel the tilt. This is just my opinion. Like I said it's all questionable either way. We can't even say a circle means a globe. A circular shape can be flat. Like a circle drawn on pavement. Antarctica holds the key to our mystery, I believe. I also believe in lands beyond the ice wall. The UN has a flat earth map hanging inside. A series of videos done by Nos Confunden, is real interesting. The maps are shown.
I was having a good laugh ( always appreciated today) - I do like your ability to see outside the normy box. No planes, even at the busiest airports on the blue balls, let alone flying? WTAF.
just on the googleearth thing, I checked out airports where I have been and personally seen lines of planes lined up coming in to land - Sydney, HK and Beijing.
No planes in the air at any of those places at all on googleearth.
Ships at sea, yep.
Cars, trucks n buses on roads, yep.
Oh man, no fucken dinos, no fucken satellites. It really is total fabrication of everything we know.
LOVE your work Agent!!!!
In 1988/9 I worked for Dr Elisabeth Muller, the inventor of Inmarsat (International Maritime Satellite). I was her speech-writer and PA. We were selling the information gathered from every Lloyds Agent located at all airports and shipping ports worldwide. Our customers were governments and Agencies like the CIA. We communicated via an early form of email as she jetted around the world selling the system. Obviously, being based in an office in the City of London, I never actually saw the satellite which relayed all the communications between Lloyds Agents and our communications hub in London. It never crossed my mind to doubt the existence of the thing. Nowadays there are several Inmarsat satellites operating in orbit and they provide the world's government (plus the exceedingly wealthy) with an alternative and exclusive, very expensive internet. They are proud to provide telecoms and internet to superyachts and private aircraft. They are also advertising that they are taking part in the Internet of Things. There is some skulduggery going on, it is unclear who owns what now..... some takeovers and name changes having occurred.
Anyway, for your future investigations, here is a link to explore: https://www.inmarsat.com/en/index.html
Can you imagine an other way to set up a system of internetlike communicatons that's not involving satellites?
Btw, is it true, that in the City of London UK-Law does not apply?
The City of London (one square mile) is an independent state within the UK. So is the Vatican and Washington DC. These are the three lairs of the Black Nobility. They each have their own laws, police force and are not answerable to the countries they exist within.
https://open.substack.com/pub/francesleader/p/the-black-nobility-podcast
EDIT:
24th June 2024 - THE INTERVIEW IN FULL IS NOW AVAILABLE ON ODYSEE!
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/150424_24p:6
Very interesting, thank you :-)
Your reporting is the best spy satellite exposing the Freemason US Government lying to the world over the past 80 years. I wonder what payload is actually being thrust into space on a regular basis by NASA and Space X if the “high-tech satellites” America is manufacturing only require a balloon to launch them into space. 🤔
I'm afraid, Agent, you're little guilty of elephant hurling - a logical fallacy I came across on Mike Stone's most recent post (https://mikestone.substack.com/p/a-senseless-strand).
https://creationwiki.org/Fallacy_of_elephant_hurling
You push out masses of evidence to support your argument without doing due diligence to check your hypothesis is correct. Why not ask around a bit first. Quora is one place you can go.
You simply need to zoom in to see planes in airports, the same for cars. This is Sydney airport zoomed in on Google maps. (When you zoom out you can't see the planes nor the cars.)
https://www.google.com/maps/@-33.9322806,151.1793264,455m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu
The following question has been asked and answered in Quora:
When watching videos or pictures of the Earth from satellites in low orbit, why can't we see airplanes flying at a high altitude? We see clouds and land masses plainly, right?
The second response provides three satellite images of the same location at different levels of zoom. You can actually see a plane but only when the image is zoomed in more.
https://www.quora.com/When-watching-videos-or-pictures-of-the-Earth-from-satellites-in-low-orbit-why-cant-we-see-airplanes-flying-at-a-high-altitude-We-see-clouds-and-land-masses-plainly-right
Like you, my sister doesn't believe in satellites and her "method" reminds me of yours. She decides what's what on a limited amount of information. Aim to prove your hypothesis wrong as best you can first before gathering mountains of evidence to support your case.
Elephant hurling, genetic fallacy, special pleading, personal incredulity and others. Discarding assumptions when conducting investigatons goes both ways. If at any point in the timeline a false conclusion propells things forward then it's a search for more selective evidence with inbuilt conclusions. That withstanding I respect all truthers and skeptics for having the courage to question anything and everything.
Truthers have everything against them at the outset. We really do need to do our utmost not to become "useful idiots" by ensuring anything we call fake really is and I don't think Agent puts enough effort in that direction.
I highly respect all curious people and Agent has done solid work, and made me question some things so I won't be guilty of genetic fallacy myself. It's difficult to know the truth of many topics or even begin to investigate, but those who undertake the journey have my respect. The assumptions being discarded is a good start, provided so are presumptions along the way.
Agent meant airplanes in the air, i'm pretty sure. And your declarations of ASK QUORA, ASK QUARA!!! are desperate. You need better technique, Petra, because right now you sound like the worn out bearings in a millstone. Agent wrote a brilliant piece and it would take you weeks to do enough research to debunk it, but you can't, and you won't, so you fling shit like monkeys at a zoo.
I'm still not sure about satellites but Agent's piece gave me a lot to think about, unlike you, Petra...what an asshole you are.
You obviously didn't read my answer carefully ... so who's the asshole?
He meant aeroplanes both in the air and in airports.
--- Re airports - I worked out myself that it's a case of zooming
--- Re in the air - an answer in quora shows an aeroplane in the air - zooming again is the key issue
When I say ask Quora I don't mean to imply that you should blindly accept whatever answers are provided (in some cases, of course, there are contradictory ones), I mean at least ask, at least attempt to find an answer. In fact, I didn't actually ask Quora I put the question into Google and Quora came up as it often does. Sometimes it's Reddit and sometimes it's just random sources - whatever. Of course, if I want to ask anything related to psyops I don't use Google generally, I used yandex or some other search engine. I know I shouldn't really use Google at all but ...
What I should have said was simply make an attempt to find an answer before producing masses of material that has no argument to support.
Please actually look at the specific answer in Quora and get back to me on its validity.
https://www.quora.com/When-watching-videos-or-pictures-of-the-Earth-from-satellites-in-low-orbit-why-cant-we-see-airplanes-flying-at-a-high-altitude-We-see-clouds-and-land-masses-plainly-right
Just use Snope.com, dude, of course they wouldn't lie either, now would they
Ok I will try that.
Righteous, Indignation, bro.
He's just lost in their jew sauce! 🤣🤔😎
Bro, 'Quara' is a total jewSA government psyop, like jewsuit jewgle Earth, ya got suckered, dude!! Wakey² sheeple grabblers!
Try measuring the circumference of Antarctica with your Google Earth. Pleasr explain,How does that work? Your cartoon continent at the bottom of a spinning, wobbling, Waterball, globe, ya just can't connect the points, can ya? Because It's impossiball! 🤔🤣😎
Why won't NASA let us see the only sourse codes for their GPS(GROUND POSITIONING SYSTEM), Not Global, silly)?
"Satellites" are held up by helium-filled balloons... NASA is the #1 purchaser of helium!
Helium is an inert gas used to condense oxygen and hydrogen to make rocket fuel.
There's lots of footage of Nasa sending up helium balloons with satellites attached to them. Look for it.
In the Book of Enoch, the entire description of the earth is told. It's not an easy read though. At least for me it wasn't. Some people dismiss the missing books of the Bible. They were hidden for a reason. The truth is never hidden. We were taught that they weren't inspired, and that may be, but that doesn't make them less credible. There are witnesses of things in the past. We have witnesses in courts. Granted, people lie in court. But I am one that questions everything since we have been deceived since we were born. People think we aren't deceived by the written Word, but even that has been tampered with by man. There shouldn't be different Bibles. There shouldn't be churches of many different denominations and organizations, that teach different doctrine. This should be common sense. Everyone should be on the same page. Religion is man-made. The cause of all our problems. It causes Christians to fight amongst themselves about who is right and who is wrong. This was meant to create confusion and divide. Just like all research on other subjects, the Bible also should be researched. Man interpreted it, and penned it. Many Bibles have more books. Many Bibles have words added, changed, deleted, verses missing, even a whole chapter in a book. If you take just the KJV Bibles, they are not all the same word for word. They should be. God gave man free will, so that includes tampering with His Word. Satan has been in control.
If satellites are fake, what about deep-space probes? Where is Voyager now, in reality? In a hangar in Nevada??
In the mind of a NASA graphic artist.
I’m just wondering what’s been taking pictures of my house with my vehicles sitting in my yard? I can actually go look it up on Google earth.
I kinda wondered that but could be planes couldn't it? Also we always laughed how they could tell your car rego no from 'space' (supposedly by satellite) but can't tell us where the various mysteriously missing planes went down.
True!
Jewgle Earth, goy!
I remember when Goog was frist creating Street View back in about...mmmm...early 2000s...they rode around in cars with a camera on top encased in an orb like thing. AND they had people walking around in the streets with cameras on poles, and wearing bright yellow jackets so they didn't run over by cars. At first I didn't know what they were doing, and only figured it out later.
I think that was their base run to document infrastructure in an intensive method. They probably still do it but I don't live in an area that I would see it.
I recall, as a youngster, watching Echo pass overhead at night. The local paper published the orbit times. As weeks went by, Echo went from spherical to lopsided, as meteroites struck it and caused to partially collapse. BTW, the photo you tagged as an A12 spyplane is of the SR71 recon aircraft.
Why use balloons for spying instead of satellites? Two photographic reasons. First, a low flying balloon can capture oblique views of earthly targets. A satellite, due to its altitude, is limited to acute views - in plain English, straight down at 90 degrees to the target. Second, the closer the camera is to the target, less distortion caused by the atmosphere is present, and proximity makes for higher resolution images. And the farther away the camera is from a moving subject, the greater the likelihood of a sharp, motion-stopping image being made. Try to photograph a racecar from just behind the trackside fence ... then shoot it from the top of the grandstand. In the first case, even a shutter speed of 1/4000 second may not prevent blur. In the latter case, 1/250 second will freeze motion. Study physics and/or master photography, and you'll be better able to separate photographic wheat from chaff.
Exceptional stuff once again Agent, I have really appreciated your recent exposes on these scientific hoaxes perpetrated against the masses. NASA is the largest purchaser of helium in the world on a yearly basis, and satelloons certainly account for a large portion of the satellites erroneously stated as being in orbit. I have my own thoughts on the shape of the Earth (https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth), but satellites don’t have to necessarily conflict with that understanding.
Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Paul LaViolette? I wrote about him a few months back: https://dfreality.substack.com/p/bc-vi-what-is-the-circle-of-the-earth. He has helped expose the weaponization of antigravity (aka electrogravitics/eletrokinetics/electric propulsion). This is the same method that many satellites are admitted to use within literature on the subject.
I guess I’m mostly curious if you found more info on this specific angle in your research on the topic? It’s an angle I don’t see mentioned much.
The sun and moon are visible to our eyes and are round! Why would the Earth be flat?
By that logic, the bulb in my lamp is round, therefore, my house must be round.
If the Earth is in a unique position, something which all emprical physical data back ups, then the sphericity of Earth in relation to the celestial bodies does not logically flow.
Fisheye lenses are round.
If there is water above, and water below us, we surely can't be a spinning ball, in space, in water. Water is always level too. This is one subject that I can't prove either way. There is too much evidence that supports both sides. I agree that some evidence is a bit shady. People actually took the tallest building here, and the tallest building across the world, put a line connecting those two buildings and it wasn't curved. It should have been. But, I don't know what they used to determine this or what software. I don't think either flat or globe earth will ever be 100% proven to be true. I believe this will remain a mystery. My question is, if people are on a ship going to the other side of the world, where a curve is shown on a globe, then why do people feel like they are going straight? Even in a plane. A plane will turn left or right, but it doesn't take a nose dive when the earth curves, nor fly sideways around it. A boat, the same thing. It's consistently floating straight. Not sideways or moving over a curve and heading down like on a roller coaster. To confuse things more, there are articles about how gravity and space do not exist.
Everyone should read the book of Enoch.
I agree!
Gravity is real, however, it’s an electrical phenomenon as opposed to the nonsensical bending of an abstract concept, such as time.
https://dfreality.substack.com/p/the-alien-agenda-part-i
Gravity!
But that only keeps you in the boat then. It still doesn't make sense if we actually go around a curve. North you would be going over like a roller coaster. East or West, you would be sideways. If gravity keeps you in the boat, you would still feel like a roller coaster going sideways. On a roller coaster you feel the tilt. This is just my opinion. Like I said it's all questionable either way. We can't even say a circle means a globe. A circular shape can be flat. Like a circle drawn on pavement. Antarctica holds the key to our mystery, I believe. I also believe in lands beyond the ice wall. The UN has a flat earth map hanging inside. A series of videos done by Nos Confunden, is real interesting. The maps are shown.
You spy you. But a little all over the place with this one, but revealing. Here’s some more food for thought.
Who’s one of the largest producers of helium?
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/helium-reserves-country-biggest-helium-031157836.html
What happens when helium production is low?
Chinese satellites held by balloons, really large ones, start falling out of the sky.
Never seen the videos of how they actually launch satellites? They’re out there.
https://www.youtube.com/live/oM5fKcU5ClI?feature=shared
There’s no space, not what they teach in schools. The only space is the one between scientist’s ears and those who believe their crap.
The world we live in is a gargantuan SCAM.
Just wonder how many believe the International Space Station is really up there 👆🏼?
You wouldn’t believe how important and valuable helium is to them. It helps them with their satellite scam.
https://www.madehow.com/Volume-4/Helium.html
Nothing can penetrate God’s firmament, that man can come up with anyway.
Of course, the following photos can be from a weather balloon or simply faked (anything can be faked by now: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-are-you-427).
Airports, allegedly photographed from satellites with plenty of planes on the ground:
https://geoawesomeness.com/worlds-busiest-15-airports-from-satellite-images/
When I search for "photos of satellites taken from Earth", just about all the images are from above, and here is an exception:
https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
I was having a good laugh ( always appreciated today) - I do like your ability to see outside the normy box. No planes, even at the busiest airports on the blue balls, let alone flying? WTAF.
Great thought provoking article. I really enjoy your sarcastic humor throughout the article. I was crying from laughing so hard! Thank you.
just on the googleearth thing, I checked out airports where I have been and personally seen lines of planes lined up coming in to land - Sydney, HK and Beijing.
No planes in the air at any of those places at all on googleearth.
Ships at sea, yep.
Cars, trucks n buses on roads, yep.
Oh man, no fucken dinos, no fucken satellites. It really is total fabrication of everything we know.
Thanks Agent for the hard work getting this.
What the fuck am I paying Skynet/starlink for?
What are those trains of light across the sky?
Holy fuck.