46 Comments
User's avatar
Anne England's avatar

Left wing, right wing. Black hats, white hats, opposites are just two sides of the same coin.

When you know that everything you see on TV or the "news" is propaganda, to divide and confuse, you no longer pay attention to any of it.

Who invented TV? What was the purpose?

Seriously, there are no "good guys" on TV or media. They're working together to control everything.

For entertainment purposes only.

FollowsTheWay's avatar

> "Who invented TV? What was the purpose?"

They told us with their nomenclature.

"Programming" and "chanel(ing)" gives the answer.

Satan.

denise ward's avatar

While Satan is the embodiment, the characterization of, entropic frequencies, this energy is not omnipotent. It is actually quite weak. The only terrain it can navigate and thrive in is the terrain of the "sub-conscious". When we talk we make things conscious and that's why they don't want us talking. Really the answers are so simple they fly right past us.

denise ward's avatar

That is true. So since it is true, what do we do who see it for what it is? Wait for this to blow over? Or do we do something? But what? We haven't even started such a conversation. And we need to. Yesterday.

Anne England's avatar

Nothing is going to blow over. I know it sounds fatalistic, but those who are spiritually minded as opposed to carnal or worldly minded are optimistic. These are the last days, so to speak.

Without a close relationship with our Creator, our Heavenly Father, we will remain fearful and depressed, and with good reason.

This world and its systems are an illusion, however. Nothing about it is real.

denise ward's avatar

Your optimism is strong and I applaud that. But be careful that you yourself are not bound into an illusion. The illusion that there is some god out there who takes care of things. I know it is not so and I believe it takes us off our true path to find what is real. It's like centralized power, it's an aberration. The real way to see it is "as below so above" not the way they wrote in scriptures. Scriptures and even science is there to take us away from knowing what's real and true. We must be proactive. And that starts by talking about everything, bringing it into the field of sound.

max's avatar

"as below so above"

That's a principle. What are the others?

denise ward's avatar

Reciprocation. Atonement. Seeing each other as another me. The Golden Rule. Pretty simple actually. Sovereignty is the greatest principle. If we abided by that mindset nobody would put up with others having jurisdiction over them. And everything would be totally different. In a good way.

max's avatar

What does the reciprocation? What arranges it? What organizes the conditions?

What organizes the atonement?

What maintains the plane of nature?

What makes an oak tree grow from a wee little acorn?

Jose Gonzales Ortego's avatar

Since it is already being rolled out you should do a deep dive on Obsidian and it's connection to all this. You'll find many of these same people are already listed on Obsidian's system as Cabal Sovereigns. https://www.cbdcintel.org

For example Alex Jones is on the list with over $288M in USDR so far. Trump has over $25B bested only by Macron who has over $36B in USDR.

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

How can we place any reliance in the CBDC website https://www.cbdcintel.org/ ? If they truly were revealing inside information, why would the perpetrators not simply shut it down?

I note with interest that I’m listed with a status of “quarantined”, ie to be liquidated. Just me and Assange appear to have that status.

I’m pleased to say my heart rate didn’t fluctuate as I scanned the list 😊

Crashedproof's avatar

Anyone that’s not vaccinated would be quarantined too.

Jose Gonzales Ortego's avatar

Two weeks after they first went live with this information their initial website was immediately shut down (and can now be found in the Internet Archive). From what I understand their current site is hosted on servers in Canada that can't be as easily taken out. It matters not at this point whether one believes or does not believe what they have been and are sharing. The system is already being rolled out. The fact you are listed as Quarantined is a good thing. It means you have not been bought out.

Omar Zaid's avatar

Never trusted him or his affected gravelly voice

B12 is a Myth's avatar

So will you be mentioning the theory that Alex Jones was a paid Fall Guy in the Sandy Hook trial claiming he needs to pay [alleged family members] $1.4 billion, and how odd it was that he then had money to start a whole new platform (Banned, now "off air") and just announced a new one: "Apr 23, 2026 · Exclusive: Alex Jones Debuts His Brand New Information Warfare Platform!"

Carol Hoon's avatar

It doesn't spell Crimea. It spells Cirmea. Other than that. I do believe you are correct about Alex Jones. I think Emric is his middle name.

grahamlyons's avatar

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"

grahamlyons's avatar

Attributed to Lavrentiy Beria...who himself came to a bad end.

FollowsTheWay's avatar

> "Anyone who dared question anything Alex said or did and anyone who didn’t agree with the content Jones was promoting."

Bill Cooper outed Jones (and 9/11).

Perhaps this is why Cooper is no longer with us.

Charles's avatar

Is that stitching of the two maps a test? lol

When you stitched them together indonesia ends up underneath India. It's way off, which means they don't matc, which means the maps are probably different. Maybe taking pics in front of a map is an occult thing though

Miss Parker's avatar

Perhaps the backdrops are signalling "minor attracted persons" before the rest of us who are always the last to know were told what "maps" mean in today's twisted parlance...

Also, the southern hemisphere shown on both maps is thought to be a safer place to survive during and/or after the upcoming mid-century cataclysms.

It's almost certain there are occult messages and agenda, as well as other hidden clues in the maps, as well as both in the fact and how they're displayed. Publication editors, writers, photographers, advertisers, etc. would have to be in on it, down to the handshakes, poses, attire, numbers and other symbols shown in published photos, articles, and adverts.

Most often, we who do not go to lodge, temple, and el-ite club meetings look at them and do not see what's in front of our faces. The riggers and distorters do not outright tell us, because they're given jobs and status or are threatened with loss of both and even life. Sometimes, they may even be loyal to the unconscionable and corrupt cause of mass deception and mafia-mason-jesuit-zionist-etc. cartel control.

Some notable observers use discerning eyes, though, and that's why many of us are here, though feeling stuck in a world without sense or compass.

Synickel's avatar

So, whatever a person might choose to use as their backdrop will have some object or symbol in it that can be tied to the occult, or illuminati, or zionism, or deep state. If it's not something obvious that goes along with many other signs like the pizzagate thing had with the people, it's a stretch.

Miss Parker's avatar

Yeah, it's a stretch to think that what's published or aired is curated by deep interests with hidden agenda and their own "language." We can continue to suspend disbelief and think the owners of our increasingly consolidated media are publishing uncontrolled, spontaneous real news and truth to serve us all, and then feel better.

Just who do you believe are choosing their backdrops and getting press coverage without belonging to the Club, besides those with internet blogs and vlogs and not large audiences?

denise ward's avatar

They have so much money (provided by us) that they literally "buy" people to do their deeds. The money system is their insurance that they will always be at the top of the heap, owning outsized resources (that belong to everyone). And on the other side of the transaction are people who are all too ready to reap the blood money. People like you and me, scientists, farmers, educators, all. Except the immensely minuscule amount of people who will not be palm-greased.

Claude Zachary's avatar

Oh man, I could write an article about this article. I heard about Stratfor by 2005. The theory was that they told him about 9/11 and that is how he "predicted" it and that they got rid of Cooper. I stopped listening to AJ in 2009 even though I was long skeptical as guests and co-workers were censored and booted off for talking smack about Israel or AJ, Jack Blood being one of the main ones, he's a great guy. He also fearmongered and lied about Y2K and that pissed Cooper off. Then he did much worse with Fukushima selling iodide and saying it was going to radiate the west! He had gone to a 2nd amendment rally at the Capitol, totally discredited it and gave the media ammo to make them all look like kooks, did something similar at Waco. I liked Obama Deception (his last doc) and that he was warning people about him as I was, but once Obama was in office he went full "fake two party paradigm" (using his term) and pushed the Birth Certificate Psyop "Obamas Russiagate". But I was also warning people about Trump in 2016 and "Q" even earlier, but I woke up to the left/right scam in 1994. Ryan Dawson was good back then exposing Jones and the Jews behind "Loose Change" but then he also pushed kooky stuff, he and Mike Rivero (whom AJ booted for talking about Israel) pushed a real plane hitting the Pentagon, think Dawson still says Building 7 fell from fire! Austin has been an Intelligence hub since at least the 60s, they had acid on the streets before anyone, same in the 80s with ecstasy. I believe all "reporters" or "influencers" from Austin are Stratfor. Good research on his office neighbors, I had no idea about that. So much of this article shows the same tactics and connections as the 2023-24 psyop and takeover of the Libertarian Party (most of whom took large bribes) by the "Covid Dissidents" that ended up huge Zionist genocide supporters, some are in government now or at least have a Rumble Channel, WC connection or run crypto pump n dumps.

Un-silent's avatar

Alex used to interview an old guy who had cancer that used to work for the Clintons, I can't remember his name (maybe Nichols). I think the guy was legit and trusted Alex. Later I saw a YT video that said that he (the old guy) had passed, it was posted by one of his friends. She stated that Alex never even contacted him on his deathbed nor after his death. I remember thinking how crappy that was of him. This article brings some light on who Alex really is, a controlled narcissist.

grahamlyons's avatar

Great delving again, Agent.

Adnan & Lamia look like an "inverted couple" to me.

"Alex, tell us it ain't so!" [that you have been an agent for Israel from the start]

denise ward's avatar

Your research is awesome as are your articles. Just that you need to know about the formula that exists on layers we can't measure. That formula is "we create what we think about mostly and what we speak about mostly". And "where attention goes, energy flows" meaning we build whatever we put our attention to.

Not that we should never speak negatively or about these vipers but we really do need to be building something a-new, something of our own. I say we build on the foundational belief in individual sovereignty. That's the complete polar opposite of what we have now and have had for eons.

djean111's avatar

Too bad the Democrats are/were not a decent party that ran a decent candidate. In fact, it looks to me like the Dems were complicit in electing Trump, and that their campaign was just a money-laundering operation. In any event, I doubt trump will be running again. Oh, and I don't like him, and I believe the only way he will help Americans is if there is some sort of equivalent to the Nobel prize for doing so. I also don't think the Dems want to help American citizens in any way, either. Too much grift to be had helping immigrants.

Miss Parker's avatar

The parties are two wings of the same bird, despite the different sounding squawking. In other words, they own both sides of the "arguments" presented, no matter how contentious the squawking sounds. They know their pretend-voting audience loves a scripted good guy-bad guy WWE and Congressional fight, while the Agenda gets advanced (with intentional little "set-backs" from time to time) and no matter which wing appears to be flying on high.

The apparence of duality is for appealing to different values, prejudices, and aesthetics of the viewing and hollow ballot-casting public. Politicians don't appear on the scene and be given media appeal without having been scheduled and schooled for years. This last election, it seemed obvious that a "right-wing" "pro-America" piss and pizzaz Prez would be needed for instigating WWIII and that this trump card will be the last played in the country's name.

denise ward's avatar

Spot on Miss Parker! We can see it for what it is whereas everyone else is talking about the fiction as though it is real, and they get all caught up in the characters. Brilliant productions because they play on the unrealized psychological programming that is inherent in humans. What cracks me up is observing this as they churn out the episodes. Especially the "voter fraud" antics they do the rub the people the wrong way. They go to a lot of trouble to make all the storyline fit. Voting for people is meaningless. They know it, but they go to the trouble of riling the voters by injecting "voter fraud". There isn't a stone they haven't turned over.

djean111's avatar

Oh, I agree. My comment was more for those who think someone other than Trump would make a difference, or, perhaps, for those who are totally pre-occupied with Trump himself. I was a lifelong Democrat, until I was a Bernie bro and then actually paid attention to the behind the curtain stuff, and now I believe both "sides" suck. Harlem Globetrotters against the Washington Generals, outcomes decided, divvy up the gate after the game. Without any of the entertainment value.

denise ward's avatar

What do you think of Thomas Massie? I wonder sometimes if he isn't another actor because they go to so much trouble to cast role players in such a perfect way in order to deceive the public, making it all seem so genuine, so real. When actually he may also be another actor. Indeed I would bet on it, as nice as he might be. What do you think of him?

Miss Parker's avatar

Honestly, I no longer follow poly-ticks!

It's funny how the actor- Hollywood politicians are pointed out and disrespected, as if they're not competent public servants compared to the others, when, in fact, the entirety of all politicians is pretty obviously a cast of actors on the take with a script. Many even have doubles.

No one with any integrity or sincerity would be able to tolerate the sham and darkness of what really goes on in the halls of our Congressional National Theater.

denise ward's avatar

Oh right on. It's almost funny to watch the people fall for it EVERY TIME. They cannot comprehend that they are watching a production. Except it's also tragic that people fall for it. They even put their children up for sacrifice as well as themselves. And they are too stupid to realize what they're being lured to do.

My dilemma is how the heck do we who see, carry on our lives in this world of utter blindness.

djean111's avatar

At present, I feel that either they are all actors, Some of them may have started out sincerely, but will soon learn about the money involved and either quit or go along. At best, we now vote for good intentions, knowing nothing will happen. Right now, Massie lost, as i understand it, and I have seen a headline that says Massie for president? And even the most sincere politician wi8ll find out that one person cannot get anything done, just be reduced to authoring bills that never get out of committee. Oh, and that's one of the little jokes of Congress - counting authoring or signing bills that will never make it to the floor as a sign of being progressive or whatever. I am pretty sure I could create an XL spreadsheet that shows exactly how every Congressperson should vote on a bill and get it passed, or keep it from passing, while mollifying their base, their donors, and the party.

denise ward's avatar

In reality, the whole thing is a scripted, casted, play to keep the people's attention on the worse kind of humans.

TGordon's avatar

Anyone with eyes to see can determine that the Stratfor and InfoWars maps are NOT the same. The overlay is off (by a lot). Nice try, though.

Oblivion Media's avatar

10 years ago, I would have scoffed at this being yet another hit piece. With everything that has happened since, I read with an open mind and I'm more than willing to accept your research and say that, yeah there are too many questions and unacceptable ones at that. Thank you for your efforts, I will continue to read with interest.

Anne England's avatar

Why am I getting spam in my Amazon photos from this account?

Synickel's avatar

You didn't look closely at the map thing. There are many things different. Infowars map has the continents much more spread out. It appears to be made of a single piece, whereas the other guy's map is in squares poorly pasted on the wall and peeling apart at the seams.

Did you try to interview Alex? He's the one that first woke me up in the 90s. I know he's egotistical and obnoxious, but he has dished out the facts. He has changed his stance on many things as he learned. I suspect your understanding of things has evolved over the years as you learn. He supported Trump, and now has disowned Trump. He defended Israel, and now realizes it is zionist-owned. Bottom line– if he was all these things you claim, he never would have been put through the phony court case, only to loose the ridiculous claim for a billion and to now loose Infowars.

I don't know. An awful lot of your stuff in the article seems weak. When people and their businesses reach a high level monetarily, and especially in media exposure, they end up with offices in areas where other high rollers are, some good, some evil. Unless you have clear and direct connection in dealing and interactions, it all ends up nothing more than speculation. Do you want to damage a person's reputation who has exposed more evil than most any other entity in the patriot world?

denise ward's avatar

You really need to be more skeptical of these guys who have millions if not billions. Why do you defend anything they do? One of the disillusioned said himself, Jones is only about being famous (and that of course goes along with being rich) Whenever people have money to be made by keeping an audience, you know that what they say cannot be truth because they don't want to lose their audience.

Synickel's avatar

A lot of people say a lot of things. You know, they may have an agenda themselves. Thanks for the advice to be more skeptical, but you're too late. I've been that way for a long time. There are many times I disagree with Alex and every other "patriot" talking head. I'm intelligent enough to listen to them all and filter.