Truth has great value,but a great truth is also that none of us represent it and correlating perfect virtues perfectly nor frankly has anyone seriously come close by core ability or intent spare Jesus Christ and our Creator.Therefore pushing for perfection in language terns and words fraught with corruptions to degrees including in medic…
Truth has great value,but a great truth is also that none of us represent it and correlating perfect virtues perfectly nor frankly has anyone seriously come close by core ability or intent spare Jesus Christ and our Creator.Therefore pushing for perfection in language terns and words fraught with corruptions to degrees including in medicine is not the higher ground regardless of if players as dark as Rockefeller is involved.
In fact the English language is laced full of witchcraft power words that even speaking reek of a degree of evil not just too a perfectly good God but even to just buy above avg discernment ie the word spell for example..in your face..
The TRUTHER movement will lose its greater value if it puts perfect truth therefore ahead of a realistic level of truth the greater community can process realistically and apply given our current positions in mass layered deceptions
If this take sounds reasonablly mostly true and reasonable to you then applied to virus issue the greatest increase in applicable to masses truth is the parameters we as TRUTHERS should be gifting the non TRUTHER ie all humanity community as an adjustment they should be striving for.
Brings up the question immediately what is the most common interpretation of the word virus to the avg citizen? I'd say it's approximately a contagious illness that's either seasonal or not with natural roots in other animals shifting to human with a mostly accepted media and science push that lab created viruses are now called virus es and not always differentiated and that status has existed too a majority of populace extent for 15-30 years+,enough time to solidify it as an agreed cultural terminology,warts and all and merely correcting natural viruses never met contagion or existence protocol that scientist once set is way too late and irrelevant too synthetic viruses meeting definition largely if imperfectly as a toxin,mold,poison,etc combined to transfer better then say an avg poison etc can transfer.
Common sense and examples of mold spores and poisons spread by liquid dispersal aerosolized or venereal diseases body contact etc automatically in your face, obviously show contagion/transferability even again if not matching natural virus stages of function protocol a few scientists thought up (likely they worked for Rockefeller types and it was always lab concoctions in play designed to mimic non existent natural viruses to push a otherwise unnecessary vaccine program with eugenics/pop control intents ).
What's equally suspect is those 4 or do studies rehashed much showing never a tad of transferability/contagion with allegedly virus infected people..If it was a toxin,mold,poison stew at least a small % subjects would definitely show transferring microparticles effecting AS THESE ARE AMONG MOST POWERFUL TOXIC COMBOS EVER PUT TOGETHER,IF COURSE THEYD HAVE SOME EFFECT ESPECIALLY WITH ONES THAT KISSED,HAD SEX..
FACT THAT NONE GOT SICK after exposure to lab stews variants they called viruses guarantees logically the staged the study's and these subjects were not Ill from lab witches brews(viruses they called them, synthetic variety!,still do,regardless of terminologys spotty history.
Why would they fake studies?Cuz if symptoms transferred it would require more studies galore to pinpoint specific means and chemicals related with solid beginnings I'm guessing and if they used truly poisoned people doing transferrings they'd be more likely to get caught faking lab viruses as done might die and in the dark compartmentalized testers potentially might blow whistle on while operation if they put things together too much.
Solution must have been to weather a minority of bad press w failed studies,still largely working today with media and hospital,pharma control.
Back to main point I just solidified more.Public is already responding to artificial, synthetic version of viruses that have contagious or more accurately transferability of symptoms abilities. All truthers have to do is inform public that fraud exists with natural version of virus and all versions were synthetic,1) salvaging virus term which they'd never ever give up in reasonable time( ie a decade or two),2)waking them up to pharma being evil and poisoning for profits,agendas for a century, and 3)The existence of labs yearly creating synthetic viruses,including flu and preying on them for draconian societal controls..leading to awareness of other controlled and perhaps a change with awareness ... Or awarenesses will cause a crackdown and make things worse...TRUTHERS feel we must try for BETTER and stop going to bed with our enemies,and ruining our body's and our souls,even if we die trying,God will see our efforts to separate from evil and take us to a heavenly home is also the Christians take on it all here ya know!?
In short screw the political,medical correctnesd on this one especially,STOP PUSHING THE NO VIRUSES EXIST CHANT AND REPLACE WITH ONLY SYNTHETIC VIRUSES EXIST FROM THE START,AND YES THERES EVIDENCE THEYVE ACHIEVED TRANSFERABILITY,JUST NOT AS DEPENDABLY AS THEY CLAIMED...USING NANO PARTICLES OF VARIOUS TYPES including graphene and lipids most currently many TRUTHERS ACCEPT as succeeding in shedding type transmission(CONTAGION,DARN IT!) which was always the only type of transmission there ever was...HELLO!? CAN YOU SEE IT NOW..?MAYBE,JUST A LITTLE CHANCE IM RIGHT, CRACK THAT DOIOR OPEN,TON OF TRUTH BEHIND IT!!
The pharmaceutical shills either noticed you TRUTHERS were chanting the No virus exist thing and plotted to use it or they amped it by broader design from start and planted a ton extra No Viruses exist videos,blurbs everywhere in 2020/21 and I knew it was disbaoanced from relevancy from the start and couldn't make sense of it for a bit
Let me make this simple...your cavernous word salads require a warm compress on my forehead.
1) Not "viruses don't exist". "Virus" as defined by "science", never found and proven in nature... which makes it kinda hard to demonstrate "it" does anything (they claim it to do) by modes of natural human to human transmission. So it is "no proof of virus"....and subsequently "voluminous catalog of demonstrably failed contagion experiments". I don't say unicorns don't exist and nor can I prove it.
ergo
2) Whatever you are making in a lab cannot be an imitator of an imaginary construct. You can certainly make plenty of chemical poisons.
3) If you have evidence of a synthetic flu "virus" (or any other) being made, introduced, and then flying around from human to human when they breathe, hug, kiss, or fornicate, please show it to me. I want to see it....otherwise I will continue to focus on the known ways they already attempt to poison us through historically proven and successful methods.
I have no reason to use the term "synthetic virus". It's just more germ nutter language.
What do you think of Dr Ardis attempt to prove Covid was involving 19 synthetic snake venoms and other lab chemicals combined that had some shedding abilities helped by nicotine?!
Regardless we need to seek antidotes or remedies for their toxic lab wepns ..I'm ok not using virus term if public can be taught fast bad actors are spreading lab concoctions to further a vaccine agenda,etc.. I don't think they'll relinquish term regardless of term politics on issue,so more lives saved using synthetic virus term as we don't want to steer public from getting best anti lab concoctions remedies period and that's what this issue is supposed to be about ,leading people sway from fraudulent virus seasonal merry-go-round and other lie virus vaccines to true antidotes if a poison or remedies if a lab combo stew.. Are you more ok with that take on issue?
Truth has great value,but a great truth is also that none of us represent it and correlating perfect virtues perfectly nor frankly has anyone seriously come close by core ability or intent spare Jesus Christ and our Creator.Therefore pushing for perfection in language terns and words fraught with corruptions to degrees including in medicine is not the higher ground regardless of if players as dark as Rockefeller is involved.
In fact the English language is laced full of witchcraft power words that even speaking reek of a degree of evil not just too a perfectly good God but even to just buy above avg discernment ie the word spell for example..in your face..
The TRUTHER movement will lose its greater value if it puts perfect truth therefore ahead of a realistic level of truth the greater community can process realistically and apply given our current positions in mass layered deceptions
If this take sounds reasonablly mostly true and reasonable to you then applied to virus issue the greatest increase in applicable to masses truth is the parameters we as TRUTHERS should be gifting the non TRUTHER ie all humanity community as an adjustment they should be striving for.
Brings up the question immediately what is the most common interpretation of the word virus to the avg citizen? I'd say it's approximately a contagious illness that's either seasonal or not with natural roots in other animals shifting to human with a mostly accepted media and science push that lab created viruses are now called virus es and not always differentiated and that status has existed too a majority of populace extent for 15-30 years+,enough time to solidify it as an agreed cultural terminology,warts and all and merely correcting natural viruses never met contagion or existence protocol that scientist once set is way too late and irrelevant too synthetic viruses meeting definition largely if imperfectly as a toxin,mold,poison,etc combined to transfer better then say an avg poison etc can transfer.
Common sense and examples of mold spores and poisons spread by liquid dispersal aerosolized or venereal diseases body contact etc automatically in your face, obviously show contagion/transferability even again if not matching natural virus stages of function protocol a few scientists thought up (likely they worked for Rockefeller types and it was always lab concoctions in play designed to mimic non existent natural viruses to push a otherwise unnecessary vaccine program with eugenics/pop control intents ).
What's equally suspect is those 4 or do studies rehashed much showing never a tad of transferability/contagion with allegedly virus infected people..If it was a toxin,mold,poison stew at least a small % subjects would definitely show transferring microparticles effecting AS THESE ARE AMONG MOST POWERFUL TOXIC COMBOS EVER PUT TOGETHER,IF COURSE THEYD HAVE SOME EFFECT ESPECIALLY WITH ONES THAT KISSED,HAD SEX..
FACT THAT NONE GOT SICK after exposure to lab stews variants they called viruses guarantees logically the staged the study's and these subjects were not Ill from lab witches brews(viruses they called them, synthetic variety!,still do,regardless of terminologys spotty history.
Why would they fake studies?Cuz if symptoms transferred it would require more studies galore to pinpoint specific means and chemicals related with solid beginnings I'm guessing and if they used truly poisoned people doing transferrings they'd be more likely to get caught faking lab viruses as done might die and in the dark compartmentalized testers potentially might blow whistle on while operation if they put things together too much.
Solution must have been to weather a minority of bad press w failed studies,still largely working today with media and hospital,pharma control.
Back to main point I just solidified more.Public is already responding to artificial, synthetic version of viruses that have contagious or more accurately transferability of symptoms abilities. All truthers have to do is inform public that fraud exists with natural version of virus and all versions were synthetic,1) salvaging virus term which they'd never ever give up in reasonable time( ie a decade or two),2)waking them up to pharma being evil and poisoning for profits,agendas for a century, and 3)The existence of labs yearly creating synthetic viruses,including flu and preying on them for draconian societal controls..leading to awareness of other controlled and perhaps a change with awareness ... Or awarenesses will cause a crackdown and make things worse...TRUTHERS feel we must try for BETTER and stop going to bed with our enemies,and ruining our body's and our souls,even if we die trying,God will see our efforts to separate from evil and take us to a heavenly home is also the Christians take on it all here ya know!?
In short screw the political,medical correctnesd on this one especially,STOP PUSHING THE NO VIRUSES EXIST CHANT AND REPLACE WITH ONLY SYNTHETIC VIRUSES EXIST FROM THE START,AND YES THERES EVIDENCE THEYVE ACHIEVED TRANSFERABILITY,JUST NOT AS DEPENDABLY AS THEY CLAIMED...USING NANO PARTICLES OF VARIOUS TYPES including graphene and lipids most currently many TRUTHERS ACCEPT as succeeding in shedding type transmission(CONTAGION,DARN IT!) which was always the only type of transmission there ever was...HELLO!? CAN YOU SEE IT NOW..?MAYBE,JUST A LITTLE CHANCE IM RIGHT, CRACK THAT DOIOR OPEN,TON OF TRUTH BEHIND IT!!
The pharmaceutical shills either noticed you TRUTHERS were chanting the No virus exist thing and plotted to use it or they amped it by broader design from start and planted a ton extra No Viruses exist videos,blurbs everywhere in 2020/21 and I knew it was disbaoanced from relevancy from the start and couldn't make sense of it for a bit
Let me make this simple...your cavernous word salads require a warm compress on my forehead.
1) Not "viruses don't exist". "Virus" as defined by "science", never found and proven in nature... which makes it kinda hard to demonstrate "it" does anything (they claim it to do) by modes of natural human to human transmission. So it is "no proof of virus"....and subsequently "voluminous catalog of demonstrably failed contagion experiments". I don't say unicorns don't exist and nor can I prove it.
ergo
2) Whatever you are making in a lab cannot be an imitator of an imaginary construct. You can certainly make plenty of chemical poisons.
3) If you have evidence of a synthetic flu "virus" (or any other) being made, introduced, and then flying around from human to human when they breathe, hug, kiss, or fornicate, please show it to me. I want to see it....otherwise I will continue to focus on the known ways they already attempt to poison us through historically proven and successful methods.
I have no reason to use the term "synthetic virus". It's just more germ nutter language.
What do you think of Dr Ardis attempt to prove Covid was involving 19 synthetic snake venoms and other lab chemicals combined that had some shedding abilities helped by nicotine?!
Regardless we need to seek antidotes or remedies for their toxic lab wepns ..I'm ok not using virus term if public can be taught fast bad actors are spreading lab concoctions to further a vaccine agenda,etc.. I don't think they'll relinquish term regardless of term politics on issue,so more lives saved using synthetic virus term as we don't want to steer public from getting best anti lab concoctions remedies period and that's what this issue is supposed to be about ,leading people sway from fraudulent virus seasonal merry-go-round and other lie virus vaccines to true antidotes if a poison or remedies if a lab combo stew.. Are you more ok with that take on issue?
Exactly.
Wasn’t JK Couey trying to make the case that viruses don’t exist in nature, but synthetic ones do?